Unraveling the Mystery of Photon Masslessness

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamataat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery Photon
AI Thread Summary
Photons are massless particles that travel at the speed of light, which distinguishes them from other particles that have rest mass. The discussion clarifies that while photons do not possess proper mass, they can be associated with inertial mass, but this does not change with speed for particles that always move at light speed. The concept of mass can vary based on context, with terms like "inertial mass" and "proper mass" being used differently in physics. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle does not imply that photons have rest mass, as their energy is never zero. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the unique properties of photons in relation to mass and speed.
Kamataat
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I understand that according to E=mc^2 any normal object can't reach the speed of light because the energy of its motion increases its mass and thus you'd need an infinite amount of energy to reach c. However, it is said that objects with no mass (i.e. photons) travel at the speed of light. Why is it said that they have no mass? Isn't it true that even they have a rest mass (because their energy can never be zero even at rest according to the Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle)? If so, then how can they reach the speed of light if they have a mass like any other object or particle?

P.S. I know only high school mathematics and physics so please try to avoid anything more serious. I only want to get a simple explanation of the principles.

- Kamataat
 
Science news on Phys.org
Kamataat said:
I understand that according to E=mc^2 any normal object can't reach the speed of light because the energy of its motion increases its mass and thus you'd need an infinite amount of energy to reach c.
This is a topic which comes up quite often. The answer is that the inertial mass (aka relativistic mass), defined as the ratio of the magnitude of the particle's momentum to the particle's speed, increases with increasing speed and that the proper mass (aka rest mass) is not a function of speed. Different people use the term "mass" to refer to different things. Some use it to refer to inertial mass while others use it to refer to proper mass.
However, it is said that objects with no mass (i.e. photons) travel at the speed of light.
When they say that they are not referring to the particle's inertial mass, they are referring to the particle's proper mass, i.e. the one that is not a function of speed.
Isn't it true that even they have a rest mass (because their energy can never be zero even at rest according to the Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle)?
According to current observations, photons do not have rest mass. And it is incorrect to claim that the energy of a photon is zero. The energy of a photon is related to the photon's inertial mass m through E = mc2.

Pete
 
So photons don't have a proper mass, but do have an inertial mass? But if the inertial mass increases with speed, then how can a photon reach the speed of light?

- Kamataat
 
Kamataat said:
So photons don't have a proper mass, but do have an inertial mass? But if the inertial mass increases with speed, then how can a photon reach the speed of light?

- Kamataat
The inertial mass is a function of speed only for tardyons and not for luxons. A tardyon is defined as a particle that always moves with a speed v < c whereas luxon is defined as a particle that always moves with speed v = c (To be complete: A tachyon is defined as a particle which always moves with speed v > c). Therefore, since relativitiy tells us that photons always travel at the same speed, c, the inertial mass of a photon is not a function of speed.

Pete
 
Obviously, particles that have only rest mass or only inertial have their own catogory of matter?, how are they diffrent?
 
Mk said:
Obviously, particles that have only rest mass or only inertial have their own catogory of matter?, how are they diffrent?


Oooops, I ment:

obviously, particles that have only rest mass or only inertial don't have their own category of matter. How are they diffrent than stuff that has both?
 
By the way, is dark matter if it exists another form of matter? The diffrent forms of matter differ in how much empty space is in it and the density of the empty space. Right or no right so far? Is it the bonds, how long the chains are? Where do you draw the line between the diffrent types of matter? Is there a list or system or something where, it says where you draw the line, between the now 7 types of matter? I guess I just want to know how they are diffrent past all the, solids hold their shape stuff

-A confused person all of a sudden :confused: :cry:

Muy big thanks :)
 
I believe the equation for proper massless particles looks like this: E^2={m^2}{c^4}+{p^2}{c^2}where p=momentum
This formula is used in x-ray and gamma ray astrophysics.
Obviously if the particle were at rest, p=0, which would bring you back to E=mc^2

Paden Roder
 
Back
Top