Unsolved Textbook Exercises: Seeking Help and Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvintc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbooks
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a user seeking help with unsolved textbook exercises, particularly in vector calculus and integrals, in preparation for an upcoming test. Key issues include confusion over the application of gradient and divergence, as well as difficulties in understanding specific problems related to Stokes' theorem and surface integrals. Participants emphasize the importance of showing work and understanding concepts rather than just receiving answers. The conversation includes detailed explanations of mathematical concepts, with users gradually clarifying their misunderstandings. Overall, the thread highlights a collaborative effort to solve complex mathematical problems and improve comprehension.
  • #31
{S1}{(x,y,z)}={x^2}{y}+{z-3}
{\nabla}{S1}={2xy}a_{x}+{x^2}a_{y}+a_{z}
S2(x,y,z)={x}{\log}{z}-{y^2}+{4}
{\nabla}{S2}={\log}{z}a_{x}-{2y}a_{y}+a_{z}\frac{{x}{\log}{e}}{z} ?
{\cos}{\phi}=\frac{{\nabla}{S1}{\cdot}{\nabla}{S2}}{{\mid}{\nabla}{S1}{\cdot}{\nabla}{S2}{\mid}} ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Precisely!
Now, you must figure out the unit normals at the intersection point, and calculate the angle between them. (log(e)=1, BTW)
 
  • #33
log e is not in base 10? it's in base e ? i get the answer correct if log e = 1.. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Sure:
Now, the natural logarithm of a number "a" is a number b=log(a), so that:
e^{b}=a (right?)
If a=e, we have:
e^{b}=e=e^{1}\to{b}=log(e)=1
 
  • #35
ic.. thanks...
 
  • #36
oic... about no.5 it asks me to prove the Stoke's Theorem.
i get \nabla\times{F}={-x^2}{a}_{z}
to find \int(\nabla\times{F})\cdot{dS} , do i need to separate the triangle to 2 pieces, one is x=0 to x=1, y=0 to y=1 and another one is x=1 to x=2, y=1 to y=0 ?
I can't get 7/6 with both ways i did.
But, \oint{F}\cdot{dl} i got 7/6.. curious..
 
  • #37
i'm taking electrical engineering...
 
  • #38
1.We agree on the expression on the curl
2. I don't see the need to split up the triangle (I'll get into that)
3. I took a master's in fluid mechanics some time ago..
 
  • #39
My choices for the two triangles:
0<=x<=1,0<=y<=x triangle 1

1<=x<=2, 0<=y<=2-x triangle 2
 
  • #40
yet, i can't get the 7/6. my answer for triangle 1 = -1/4, then triangle 2 = -19/40... sums up can't get 7/6.. anything wrong?

master! oh, it's incredible..
 
Last edited:
  • #41
about (1) since z=0, a_{r} has no a_{x} component , a_{\phi} = -\sin{\phi}{a}_{x} + \cos{\phi}{a}_{y}
e^{-2}\sin\frac{\phi}{2}*-\sin\phi=-0.102
 
  • #42
no.6 i translate all x,y,z into cylindrical coordinates.
x = r\cos\phi
y = r\sin\phi
z = z
a_{x} = \cos{\phi}{a}_{r} - \sin{\phi}{a}_{\phi}
a_{y} = \sin{\phi}{a}_{r} + \cos{\phi}{a}_{\phi}
a_{x} = a_{z}
dS = rd\phi{d}{r}a_{r}
Hence,
F_{r} = r^2\cos^3\phi + r^2\sin^3\phi
integrate i can't get the answer also..
 
Last edited:
  • #43
Hi again!
I got 7/6 in 5); I'll take that first.

1. 7/6 is the number you get by the line integral going around the surface in one direction; -7/6 if you go in the opposite direction

2. We let the normal vector in the surface integral be \vec{n}=-\vec{a}_{z}

3. Hence, we must calculate I:
I=\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{x}x^{2}dydx+\int_{1}^{2}\int_{0}^{2-x}x^{2}dydx

The first integral is: I_{1}=\frac{1}{4}
The second integral is: I_{2}=\frac{11}{12}

This yields 7/6 in total..
 
Last edited:
  • #44
thanks again.. hehe... oh... i really made too much mistakes in calculation.. sad
 
  • #45
No wonder you're stuck by 6)!

As far as I can see, the surface integral (the flux) on the cylindrical shell is 0.

However, if you consider the fluxes through the top and bottom disks (z=0 and z=2) as well, you'll get for the total flux 16\pi which seems to agree with the answer..
 
  • #46
Please post some work on 1)
 
  • #47
replace z=0 and z=2 to get (z^2-1) ?
then find \int{rd\phi}{dr} ?
by this i get 16\pi...
i also get the surface integral in r direction = 0
 
  • #48
(1) a_{r} = \cos{\phi}{a}_{x} + \sin{\phi}{a}_{y}
a_{\phi} = -\sin{\phi}{a}_{x} + \cos{\phi}{a}_{y}
a_{z} = a_{z}
then z=0, so vector in x direction only depends on phi .
-e^{-2}\sin\frac{\phi}{2}\sin\phi=-0.0586
 
Last edited:
  • #49
I'm not sure if your post 47 is a cry for help, or if you got my meaning.
I'll look into 1) later
 
  • #50
i think i got the answer for (6). just not sure whether the method is wrong or not
 
  • #51
Post in detail how you get the answer in 6)
 
  • #52
i got 4 for z=0 to z=2 for (z^2-1) then integrate get 2pie x r since r=2 then 4 times 4pie get 16pie
 
  • #53
Ok, you've got two disks you've got to integrate over in 6)

a) The disk placed at z=2.
At that plane, we have :
\vec{F}\cdot\vec{n}=(z^{2}-1)|_{(z=2)}=3
Or, it's contribution is: 3*\pi(2)^{2}=12\pi

b) The disk placed at z=0
At that plane, we have:
\vec{F}\cdot\vec{n}=(1-z^{2})|_{(z=0)}=1
Or, it's contribution is: \pi(2)^{2}=4\pi

Is this how you thought?
 
  • #54
ya... i did it like that
 
  • #55
i had been doing these qs over the past few weeks and there are still some questions remained unsolved.. anyone can help ?
q3, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K