Unveiling the Mystery of Simultaneity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Santural
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery Simultaneity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of simultaneity in the context of special relativity, specifically addressing how observers perceive simultaneous events differently based on their relative motion. When a rocket ship moves at speeds close to the speed of light (0.8886c), an observer in the rocket sees two lightning flashes, which are simultaneous in the Earth's frame, as occurring at different times due to the finite speed of light and the motion of the observer. The discussion highlights the importance of the observer's frame of reference and the Einstein synchronization convention for clock synchronization, illustrating that simultaneity is not absolute but relative to the observer's motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Einstein synchronization convention
  • Knowledge of the speed of light (c) and its implications
  • Basic grasp of Lorentz transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity on simultaneity
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their applications
  • Explore the concept of time dilation and its mathematical formulation
  • Investigate the Einstein synchronization method in detail
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the nuances of special relativity and the nature of time and simultaneity in different reference frames.

  • #31
Santural said:
...:bugeye:
Would someone explain paw's question and Jesse's answer? My thirst for knowledge drives me on!:confused: :confused: :confused:

(Assuming that you're referring to post #28)

Paw wants to know whether synchronised clocks go out-of-synch for an observer in relative motion due to the time it takes for light to travel from the clocks, because they are placed at different distances to the observer.

The short answer is No. As for an explanation, I don't think I can do it better than JesseM. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
And so Santural understood the question.
And so he understood the answer.
And so he was happy again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
9K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
917