Upper Bound Theorem: Verifying Inequality & Non-Planarity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Upper Bound Theorem in graph theory, specifically focusing on verifying an inequality related to planarity and exploring the implications of the theorem. Participants are examining the conditions under which a graph can be classified as planar based on the given inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the meaning of the variable 'n' in the context of the theorem and its implications for planarity. There is also discussion about the definitions of various terms and the existence of multiple interpretations of the upper bound theorem and algorithms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on specific terms and concepts. Some have provided speculative interpretations regarding the variable 'n', while others emphasize the need to refer to the original source material for accurate definitions. There is no explicit consensus on the meaning of 'n' or the correctness of the assumptions being made.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there may be multiple definitions and interpretations of the upper bound theorem and the inside-outside algorithm, which could lead to confusion. Additionally, there is a mention of the need to reference textbooks or other materials for clarification on the variables involved.

Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
The converse of the Upper Bound Theorem would state that a graph which satisfies the inequality

e \leq { \frac{n (v-2)}{n-2} is planar.

This converse is not true as seen in picture.

Verify that the inequality e \leq { \frac{n (v-2)}{n-2} is true for this graph.

Using the inside-outside algorithm to show that the graph is actually non-planar.
 

Attachments

  • Pic 2.jpg
    Pic 2.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 419
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does anyone know what the n stands for?
 
Last edited:
e = edges
v = vertices

but what is n?
 
There is more than one "upper bound theorem" and more than one "inside-out algorithm." Why don't you start by stating them here? This will help you as well as me. Your book should tell you what n is in the theorem statement.
 
Even using google doesn't help me to understand what n is?
 
Yes, so look in your book.
 
Not in my book
 
It will be explained wherever you got the question from.
 
I'll take a guess- perhaps n is the smallest cycle. This would correspond to the face with the smallest number of edges in a planar graph*, so you would have n<=2e/f. Apply Euler's to get rid of f (this is assuming planar) and fiddle around and you can get the inequality you've posted.

But yea, this should be in your book, notes, or wherever this problem is from, so find it in your materials as my guess may not be what they are after (though it does look like it).*edit- this isn't quite right, but the minimal cycle length is <= the smallest number of edges on a face and the rest is the same.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K