Upper & Lower Sums: Calculating & Understanding Mi & mi

  • Thread starter Thread starter imull
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sums
Click For Summary
Upper and lower sums in calculus are calculated using the equations Ʃf(Mi)Δx for upper sums and Ʃf(mi)Δx for lower sums, where Mi and mi represent the maximum and minimum values of a function within a given interval, respectively. The heights of the rectangles used in these sums correspond to the maximum (Mi) and minimum (mi) values of the function over the width of each rectangle. The discussion clarifies that Mi refers to the x-values that yield the heights of the taller rectangles, while mi corresponds to the heights of the shorter rectangles. Misinterpretations of notation can occur, but the definitions remain consistent across texts. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the fundamentals of integral approximation.
imull
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I am really having trouble understanding how upper and lower sums are calculated. In the equations Ʃf(Mi)Δx and Ʃf(mi)Δx, what do Mi and mi represent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easiest to understand if you look at a picture. In the figure below (shamelessly borrowed from elsewhere via Google Images), the pink rectangles represent the upper sums and the green rectangles represent the lower sums.

In other words, the ##M_i## are the heights of the taller (pink + green) rectangles, and the ##m_i## are the heights of the shorter (green only) rectangles.

How are the heights determined? Quite simple. Each tall rectangle is exactly as high as the maximum value of the function within the width of the rectangle. Each short rectangle is exactly as high as the minimum value of the function.

fFUOJ.png
 

Attachments

  • fFUOJ.png
    fFUOJ.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 465
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jbunniii said:
In other words, the ##M_i## are the heights of the taller (pink + green) rectangles, and the ##m_i## are the heights of the shorter (green only) rectangles.

No. ##M_i## are the x values such that ##f(M_i)## are the heights of the taller rectangles. Similarly for ##m_i##.
 
You're correct of course, but that is such unusual notation it makes you wonder if the OP copied the expression correctly from his text.
 
pwsnafu said:
No. ##M_i## are the x values such that ##f(M_i)## are the heights of the taller rectangles. Similarly for ##m_i##.
Oh, weird. You're right. I misread the question to say what it would have said in most books.
 
I did copy them from my text. I wasn't sure how else to go about this.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K