I Use the Ewald sphere to calculate h,k,l?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lars Ph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
Click For Summary
The Ewald sphere is primarily used to calculate the d_hkl for the diffracted wave vector, not directly for determining lattice constants. For cubic lattices, the relationship d = a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2) requires knowledge of h, k, and l to find the lattice constant "a." It is not possible to determine the lattice constant solely from the Ewald sphere without additional information about the crystal structure or the diffracted order. The Ewald sphere reflects energy conservation in scattering but does not provide insights into the crystal lattice itself. Thus, understanding the lattice requires either knowing the lattice constant or the d_hkl value.
Lars Ph
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Is there a way to use the ewald sphere to calculate h,k,l?
I am unsure wether or not all I can use the Ewald sphere for is to calculate d_hkl for the diffracted wave vector. For cubic lattices for example d= a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2). To determine the lattice constant "a" you would then need to know exactly what your h,k and l are or you use lattice-dependent requirements like "h+k+l are an even or odd number" in conjunction with the determined d_hkl to find your a (I think). My question is, is there a different way to find the lattice constant solely by using the Ewald sphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean without knowing d ? No. You need to know either a to find d or vice versa. This is the same as needing to know the grating spacing to determine the wavelength for light You also need to know the defracted order. In 3D, it is a bit more complicated but the physics is the same.
 
Lars Ph said:
TL;DR Summary: Is there a way to use the ewald sphere to calculate h,k,l?

I am unsure wether or not all I can use the Ewald sphere for is to calculate d_hkl for the diffracted wave vector. For cubic lattices for example d= a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2). To determine the lattice constant "a" you would then need to know exactly what your h,k and l are or you use lattice-dependent requirements like "h+k+l are an even or odd number" in conjunction with the determined d_hkl to find your a (I think). My question is, is there a different way to find the lattice constant solely by using the Ewald sphere?
The Ewald sphere depends only on the wavelength of the incident radiation so it has nothing to do with the lattice. If you look at different crystals with the same radiation the Ewald sphere is always the same. That means that it must be impossible to deduce anything about the crystal from the Ewald sphere alone.
 
Yes. The Ewald sphere is simply a statement about energy conservation in the scattering process where the periodicity of the (~infinitely massive) crystal lattice has allowed momentum to not be strictly conserved (it can change by any reciprocal lattice vector) .
 
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K