I Use the Ewald sphere to calculate h,k,l?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lars Ph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
Lars Ph
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Is there a way to use the ewald sphere to calculate h,k,l?
I am unsure wether or not all I can use the Ewald sphere for is to calculate d_hkl for the diffracted wave vector. For cubic lattices for example d= a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2). To determine the lattice constant "a" you would then need to know exactly what your h,k and l are or you use lattice-dependent requirements like "h+k+l are an even or odd number" in conjunction with the determined d_hkl to find your a (I think). My question is, is there a different way to find the lattice constant solely by using the Ewald sphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean without knowing d ? No. You need to know either a to find d or vice versa. This is the same as needing to know the grating spacing to determine the wavelength for light You also need to know the defracted order. In 3D, it is a bit more complicated but the physics is the same.
 
Lars Ph said:
TL;DR Summary: Is there a way to use the ewald sphere to calculate h,k,l?

I am unsure wether or not all I can use the Ewald sphere for is to calculate d_hkl for the diffracted wave vector. For cubic lattices for example d= a/sqrt(h^2+k^2+l^2). To determine the lattice constant "a" you would then need to know exactly what your h,k and l are or you use lattice-dependent requirements like "h+k+l are an even or odd number" in conjunction with the determined d_hkl to find your a (I think). My question is, is there a different way to find the lattice constant solely by using the Ewald sphere?
The Ewald sphere depends only on the wavelength of the incident radiation so it has nothing to do with the lattice. If you look at different crystals with the same radiation the Ewald sphere is always the same. That means that it must be impossible to deduce anything about the crystal from the Ewald sphere alone.
 
Yes. The Ewald sphere is simply a statement about energy conservation in the scattering process where the periodicity of the (~infinitely massive) crystal lattice has allowed momentum to not be strictly conserved (it can change by any reciprocal lattice vector) .
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top