Is it Possible to Index a Cubic Lattice with h^2+k^2+l^2=7?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elevenb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Lattice
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenge of indexing reflections from a cubic lattice, specifically addressing the equation h2 + k2 + l2 = 7. It is established that for Body-Centered Cubic (BCC) lattices, certain reflections, such as (100) and those with odd sums of Miller indices, are forbidden. The first observable peak is (110) with h2 + k2 + l2 = 2. The confusion arises when incorrectly assigning peaks, leading to the erroneous conclusion that 7 can occur in cubic patterns, which is not possible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Miller indices and their application in crystallography
  • Familiarity with cubic lattice structures, particularly Body-Centered Cubic (BCC)
  • Knowledge of reflection selection rules in crystallography
  • Ability to interpret crystallographic data from scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the "Selection Rules for Reflections in Cubic Crystals" to understand forbidden reflections
  • Learn about Miller indices and their significance in indexing crystal structures
  • Explore the implications of Body-Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice structures on diffraction patterns
  • Investigate examples of indexing reflections in different crystal systems, including face-centered cubic (FCC)
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, crystallographers, and students in materials science or solid-state physics who are involved in indexing crystal structures and understanding diffraction patterns.

elevenb
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,

I've been given a problem where I have to index reflections from a cubic lattice, the procedure is simple enough but I'm getting a case where I get :

h^2+k^2+l^2=7

I've taken to many books, but most either don't mention the topic or say they are simply 'forbidden' reflections. I have also seen where I should double hkl before indexing but I haven't seen a concrete example of this.

I don't think irrational miller indices are the solution here either.

Any contribution would be so helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I never did index a crystal, but the situation appears to be quite trivial. Specifically, I was looking at the table "Selection Rules for Reflections in Cubic Crystals" here
http://www.khwarizmi.org/system/files/activities/146/csd1.pdf
I suppose your substance is BCC. Then you don't observe the peak (100) with h^2 +k^2 +l^2=1, because it is forbidden for a BCC lattice. Instead, the first peak you observe is (110) with h^2 +k^2 +l^2=2. If you wrongly assign it as (100) , you will assign also the following peaks wrong. You don't realize this immediately, because all peaks with h^2+k^2+l^2 odd are forbidden, too. So you will assume for them with h^2 +k^2 +l^2=n instead of 2n. The first time you notice is with the peak (321) for which you obtain h^2+k^2+l^2=7 instead of 14, but 7 never occurs in any cubic pattern.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K