Using 555 & 556 Timers for 3-Way Solenoid Valve

  • Thread starter Thread starter simo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on using a 556 timer for controlling a 3-way solenoid valve, specifically to achieve a sequence where both valves are closed for 10 seconds, followed by the first valve opening for 20 ms, and then the second valve opening for 20 ms. Participants suggest that while a 556 timer can be used, a more accurate timing solution would involve a stable time base, such as a crystal oscillator with a 74HC4060 divider. Alternatives like using individual 555 timers or a CD4538 dual timer are also recommended for better timing precision and ease of use.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 556 timer functionality and configuration
  • Basic knowledge of solenoid valve operation and control
  • Familiarity with crystal oscillators and frequency division
  • Experience with electronic components like the 74HC4060 and CD4538
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the configuration and applications of the 556 timer in astable mode
  • Learn about using crystal oscillators for precise timing in electronic circuits
  • Explore the functionality and advantages of the CD4538 dual timer
  • Investigate alternative methods for timing control in solenoid valve applications
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, hobbyists, and engineers working on solenoid valve control systems, particularly those interested in timing circuits and precision control methods.

simo
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm planning on using a 556 timer for a 3-way solenoid valve. I need to have both valves closed for a period of 10 seconds, then open the first valve for 20 ms, followed by the opening of the second valve for 20 ms. This is astable. Is it possible to line up the timing using a 556 timer or do I have to use two 555 timers? How do I get the second valve to start its timing sequence 20 ms after the first?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
simo said:
I'm planning on using a 556 timer for a 3-way solenoid valve. I need to have both valves closed for a period of 10 seconds, then open the first valve for 20 ms, followed by the opening of the second valve for 20 ms. This is astable. Is it possible to line up the timing using a 556 timer or do I have to use two 555 timers? How do I get the second valve to start its timing sequence 20 ms after the first?

555 timers are not very accurate. It would be better to use a stable time base (crystal oscillator) and divide down your clocks. You could base it on the 74HC4060, for example, and use a 32kHz watch crystal for the time base. Have you considered doing it that way?

http://www.nxp.com/#/pip/pip=[pip=74HC_HCT4060_CNV_2]|pp=[t=pip,i=74HC_HCT4060_CNV_2]
 
berkeman said:
Have you considered doing it that way?

No, I've never heard of this. I'm new to electronics and was hoping to use the 555 timer because I understood it.
 
A 556 timer is just two 555's in a single package. (I think you can get 4 in a package in a 558). Each are independent. So you would use one to create the 10 sec delay as a one-shot. Then use the output as the trigger for the second to create the 20msec delay. Then use the output of the second to trigger a 3rd for the second valve.

As discussed above, there are many, many ways to accomplish this. It all depends on what you are trying to "optimize". For example, you could just use one of the 555's as a 20msec clock. Then use other logic to switch the desired pulse to the right valve driver.

But, if the timing isn't overly critical and package count, etc. aren't critical, 555's are a straightforward way to go, and will interface pretty easily with your valve driver. They have a wide Supply Voltage range, so you can probably power them with the same supply as the valve driver (no need for separate 5Volt supply, etc.).

For my part, I'm partial to the CD4538 which is a dual timer, even easier to use than the 555, and cheaper.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K