Using 555 & 556 Timers for 3-Way Solenoid Valve

  • Thread starter Thread starter simo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Using a 556 timer for controlling a 3-way solenoid valve can be effective, as it combines two 555 timers in one package. The proposed sequence involves keeping both valves closed for 10 seconds, then opening the first valve for 20 ms, followed by the second valve for another 20 ms. While 555 timers are simple to use, they may lack precision, leading to suggestions for a more stable time base using a crystal oscillator. Alternatives like the CD4538 dual timer are also recommended for easier implementation. Overall, the choice of components depends on the desired timing accuracy and complexity of the circuit.
simo
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm planning on using a 556 timer for a 3-way solenoid valve. I need to have both valves closed for a period of 10 seconds, then open the first valve for 20 ms, followed by the opening of the second valve for 20 ms. This is astable. Is it possible to line up the timing using a 556 timer or do I have to use two 555 timers? How do I get the second valve to start its timing sequence 20 ms after the first?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
simo said:
I'm planning on using a 556 timer for a 3-way solenoid valve. I need to have both valves closed for a period of 10 seconds, then open the first valve for 20 ms, followed by the opening of the second valve for 20 ms. This is astable. Is it possible to line up the timing using a 556 timer or do I have to use two 555 timers? How do I get the second valve to start its timing sequence 20 ms after the first?

555 timers are not very accurate. It would be better to use a stable time base (crystal oscillator) and divide down your clocks. You could base it on the 74HC4060, for example, and use a 32kHz watch crystal for the time base. Have you considered doing it that way?

http://www.nxp.com/#/pip/pip=[pip=74HC_HCT4060_CNV_2]|pp=[t=pip,i=74HC_HCT4060_CNV_2]
 
berkeman said:
Have you considered doing it that way?

No, I've never heard of this. I'm new to electronics and was hoping to use the 555 timer because I understood it.
 
A 556 timer is just two 555's in a single package. (I think you can get 4 in a package in a 558). Each are independent. So you would use one to create the 10 sec delay as a one-shot. Then use the output as the trigger for the second to create the 20msec delay. Then use the output of the second to trigger a 3rd for the second valve.

As discussed above, there are many, many ways to accomplish this. It all depends on what you are trying to "optimize". For example, you could just use one of the 555's as a 20msec clock. Then use other logic to switch the desired pulse to the right valve driver.

But, if the timing isn't overly critical and package count, etc. aren't critical, 555's are a straightforward way to go, and will interface pretty easily with your valve driver. They have a wide Supply Voltage range, so you can probably power them with the same supply as the valve driver (no need for separate 5Volt supply, etc.).

For my part, I'm partial to the CD4538 which is a dual timer, even easier to use than the 555, and cheaper.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Back
Top