Using Conservation of Energy to Find Friction Coefficient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 2.00 kg block on a rough incline connected to a spring, with the goal of finding the coefficient of kinetic friction. The block moves down the incline before coming to rest, and the setup includes considerations of gravitational potential energy, spring potential energy, and frictional forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy, questioning how to account for energy losses due to friction. There are attempts to equate initial gravitational potential energy with final spring potential energy and energy lost to friction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered alternative approaches and observations regarding the direction of forces and the nature of the coefficients of friction. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in the calculations, particularly concerning the work done by friction and the correct application of angles in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the distinction between static and kinetic friction coefficients, as well as the implications of the block's movement on the forces acting on it. There is also mention of the need for clarity on the mechanical energy transformations involved in the problem.

312213
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.00 kg block situated on a rough incline is connected to a spring of negligible mass having a spring constant of 100 N/m. The block is released from rest when the spring is unstretched, and the pulley is frictionless. The block moves 0.204 m down the incline before coming to rest. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and incline.
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/9474/physicsam.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Final position is used as 0 height.
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/2420/physicsm.jpg
The way I see the forces is that Fs and Ffric acts in one direction and Fgsin37 opposes it.
Fs+Ffric=Fgsin37
kx+u(mgcos37)=mgsin37
100(0.204)+u((2)(9.8)cos37)=(2)(9.8)sin37
u=-0.55
Coefficient came out negative so this approach won't work.

For the most part, I don't understand how to approach this problem. What does it seem like I don't understand?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
312213 said:

Homework Statement


A 2.00 kg block situated on a rough incline is connected to a spring of negligible mass having a spring constant of 100 N/m. The block is released from rest when the spring is unstretched, and the pulley is frictionless. The block moves 0.204 m down the incline before coming to rest. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and incline.
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/9474/physicsam.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Final position is used as 0 height.
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/2420/physicsm.jpg
The way I see the forces is that Fs and Ffric acts in one direction and Fgsin37 opposes it.
Fs+Ffric=Fgsin37
kx+u(mgcos37)=mgsin37
100(0.204)+u((2)(9.8)cos37)=(2)(9.8)sin37
u=-0.55
Coefficient came out negative so this approach won't work.

For the most part, I don't understand how to approach this problem. What does it seem like I don't understand?

If you are going to use the conservation of energy why don't you use all the mechanical energy you have before the mass is released. and set that equal to all the mechanical energy after plus the "loss" of mechanical engergy due to friction as thermal energy.

If the plane was frictionless the mass would be displaced further down the plane as one way to view it, yes? Then it seems to me you can figure out the normal force on the block. And the force of static friction can be figured using the energy/work. Then you have mu? This is a cursory observation of the situation that I believe will work.

I think the title of your question said using the conservation of energy? So maybe you start off with all GPE to begin with and end with spring pot. energy 1/2k(x^2) and heat(due to friction)... does this stuff strike you as familiar?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ui=Kf+Usf+Ef
mgh=0+1/2kx²+E
(2)(9.8)(0.204sin37)=(1/2)(100)(0.204)²+E
0.3255J=E

The nonconserved energy is the work of friction so
W=(Ffric)rcos37
0.3255=u((2)(9.8)cos37)(0.204)cos37
u=0.128
(0.12763323293335829568080338705843)

Does the nonconserved energy convert to mu like that?
 
That looks good. BTW, what the two different results suggests is that your assumption about the direction of the frictional force at the new equilibrium is wrong. In other words , it is working to oppose the block being pulled back up the incline. That the magnitude of 0.55 is also wrong suggests that the static and kinetic cooefients are different--since you were asked to find the kinetic coefficient, your second approach was the right one.
 
The work seems to have worked correctly up until the part of
W=(Ffric)rcos37
0.3255=u((2)(9.8)cos37)(0.204)cos37

One of those cos37 shouldn't be there. Which is it? Or are either acceptable to be there, so long as only one is?
 
312213 said:
The work seems to have worked correctly up until the part of
W=(Ffric)rcos37
0.3255=u((2)(9.8)cos37)(0.204)cos37

One of those cos37 shouldn't be there. Which is it? Or are either acceptable to be there, so long as only one is?
That last cos 37 is not correct. W_f = F_f . d = uN(d)cos alpha, where alpha is the angle between the friction force and displacement vectors, alpha = ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K