Using constructive interference of audio frequency waves to lower distortion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for using constructive interference in audio horns to reduce distortion. It highlights that while horns can produce constructive interference, they also inherently create destructive interference, complicating the elimination of distortion. Properly designed horns can minimize non-linear distortions, functioning as effective transmission lines, but practical limitations exist, particularly at low frequencies. The conversation suggests that larger horns may produce less distortion, but acknowledges the challenges of phase irregularities affecting sound quality. Ultimately, while improvements are possible, achieving complete distortion elimination remains complex.
arivel
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Hello everybody .
I would like to ask you for an opinion.
audio waves passing through a horn or waveguide experience a small or relatively large distortion.
do you think it is possible to eliminate distortion by making use of constructive interference?
 
Science news on Phys.org
arivel said:
do you think it is possible to eliminate distortion by making use of constructive interference

I'm not sure what you actually mean by the question.

Bearing in mind that a horn is a matching device that works by producing 'constructive interference' of a range of frequencies, the horn will do what it can within the limits of the space available.

The horn is basically a linear device so the distortion is linear. It could be described as a wave filter because it is a distributed, rather than a lumped component filter. Horn design is based on reducing the reflected energy at the mouth by attempting constructive interference in the forward direction and destructive interference of the reflected wave.

You can't 'under drive' two horn speakers and lower the distortion level as you could with two amplifiers by adding the outputs.

If you have room to spare then a larger (longer) horn could perhaps produce less distortion.
 
arivel said:
do you think it is possible to eliminate distortion by making use of constructive interference?
Anything is possible.

If you have constructive interference, then you probably also have destructive interference. How can you know which one will cause more or less distortion.

The radiation pattern will depend on the frequency and the diameter of the horn, (measured in wavelengths). You can expect folded horns to have length determined frequency dependent characteristics.

How do you define distortion? As sophiecentaur says it is most unlikely that a horn will generate harmonics of a fundamental wave. On the other hand, the phase delay of the different harmonics in a complex waveform will differ. That will appear as waveform distortion when viewed with instrumentation, but your ear and brain will not be able to hear or determine the phase differences.
 
Baluncore said:
If you have constructive interference, then you probably also have destructive interference. How can you know which one will cause more or less distortion.
There won't be any non-linear distortions in any properly made horn. An ideal horn (basically one that is long enough) functions by the interference of reflected and transmitted waves within the length of the taper. A horn is basically a transmission line with a steadily changing characteristic impedance. Energy is constantly being reflected at every point but the reflected energy is canceled by energy reflected at other points. Ideally, there will be no net reflection over the operating bandwidth and all the energy is transmitted. It's an excellent broad band matching unit, but bulky! There will be a wavelength beyond which this effect starts to fail and a horn loudspeaker can seldom be long enough to deal with very low audio frequencies. That will produce a low frequency droop (a distortion). A folded horn introduces further distortions because the transmission line is not 'ideal'.
Across the mouth of any real horn, there will be some phase irregularities and that can affect the beam pattern at different frequencies. I have no idea whether or not it would be possible to combine (different?) horns in some way to compensate for phase problems inside the horns by suitable positioning of the horns but I wouldn't mind betting that you could do better just by making a single, bigger horn.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top