Using Eddington Luminosity to calculate mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between a star's luminosity and its mass, specifically using the equations for stellar luminosity and the Eddington limit to explore maximum mass calculations. Participants are examining how these equations apply to both massive stars and quasars, with a focus on understanding the implications of the Eddington limit in astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the luminosity of a star and its mass, questioning how to equate the two equations provided. There are attempts to solve for mass using the given formulas, with some participants expressing confusion about the implications of their calculations. Others suggest that the maximum mass occurs when the luminosity equations are set equal to each other.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on equating the luminosity equations to find mass, while others are still grappling with the concepts and calculations involved. There is a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the final answers or methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations provided in the problem statement specify units in solar masses and luminosities, which influences their calculations. There is also mention of uncertainties regarding the physical principles behind the scenarios presented, particularly in relation to quasars.

Ellie Snyder
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The nuclear reactions in a star’s core are very sensitive to pressure and temperature, so high mass stars have much higher luminosities. The luminosities of massive stars have been observed to obey the following scaling relationship with mass (M):

Lstar = (34.2)*M^2.4, where M, L have units of MSun, LSun.

The Eddington limit is the maximum luminosity an object (such as a star) can achieve and still retain a balance between the outward force of energy from the center and inward pull of gravity. The following formula is for the Eddington Limit (LEdd), i.e., the luminosity which stops the inward pull of gravity:

LEdd = (3.2*10^4)*M, where M, L have units of MSun, LSun.

a. Using these two equations, calculate the maximum mass of a star in solar units.

b. A bright quasar has a luminosity of about 10^13 LSun. The source of its power is a supermassive black hole that attracts surrounding gas into a hot (~10^6 K), compact accretion disk which radiates light. If the quasar is to continue attracting gas into its central black hole, what is its minimum mass?

Homework Equations


Lstar = (34.2)*M^2.4
LEdd = (3.2*10^4)*M

The Attempt at a Solution


a. Solved for M in the Lstar eqn to get (Lstar/34.2)^1/2.4 and plugged that into the LEdd eqn. Got 7344.7Lstar^1/2.4, and plugged that in for LEdd to get an M of 0.2295Lstar^1/2.4, which is obviously preposterous. I guess I'm not sure how to relate the equations to solve for M.

b. Waiting to attempt this one until I have a better understanding of a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ellie Snyder said:

Homework Statement


The nuclear reactions in a star’s core are very sensitive to pressure and temperature, so high mass stars have much higher luminosities. The luminosities of massive stars have been observed to obey the following scaling relationship with mass (M):

Lstar = (34.2)*M^2.4, where M, L have units of MSun, LSun.

The Eddington limit is the maximum luminosity an object (such as a star) can achieve and still retain a balance between the outward force of energy from the center and inward pull of gravity. The following formula is for the Eddington Limit (LEdd), i.e., the luminosity which stops the inward pull of gravity:

LEdd = (3.2*10^4)*M, where M, L have units of MSun, LSun.

a. Using these two equations, calculate the maximum mass of a star in solar units.

b. A bright quasar has a luminosity of about 10^13 LSun. The source of its power is a supermassive black hole that attracts surrounding gas into a hot (~10^6 K), compact accretion disk which radiates light. If the quasar is to continue attracting gas into its central black hole, what is its minimum mass?

Homework Equations


Lstar = (34.2)*M^2.4
LEdd = (3.2*10^4)*M

I think the correct equation for the Eddington Luminosity Limit is

LEdd = (3.2×104) ⋅ (Mstar / Msun) ⋅ Lsun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_luminosity
 
SteamKing said:
I think the correct equation for the Eddington Luminosity Limit is

LEdd = (3.2×104) ⋅ (Mstar / Msun) ⋅ Lsun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_luminosity
Hmm. I believe you but since I was given that formula in the question itself, I think I should use it to answer the question, even if it is off base.
 
Ellie Snyder said:
Hmm. I believe you but since I was given that formula in the question itself, I think I should use it to answer the question, even if it is off base.
Well, the factor which was missing from your original equation was the luminosity of the sun. Perhaps it got lost when you were drafting your post.
 
SteamKing said:
I think the correct equation for the Eddington Luminosity Limit is

LEdd = (3.2×104) ⋅ (Mstar / Msun) ⋅ Lsun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_luminosity
Ellie specified that M and L were in solar units (hence Msun=1 and Lsun=1) so the expression is the same.

@Ellie Snyder
You solved for M in terms of L_star, but L_star is unknown, so that isn't a useful thing to do.

I think you've realized that the maximum mass occurs when L_star = L_Edd, right? So then algebraically you can just equate those two expressions:
##L_{star}=L_{Edd}\Rightarrow 34.2M^{2.4}=32000M##
So that way the equation involves only M and not L.
 
Nathanael said:
Ellie specified that M and L were in solar units (hence Msun=1 and Lsun=1) so the expression is the same.

@Ellie Snyder
You solved for M in terms of L_star, but L_star is unknown, so that isn't a useful thing to do.

I think you've realized that the maximum mass occurs when L_star = L_Edd, right? So then algebraically you can just equate those two expressions:
##L_{star}=L_{Edd}\Rightarrow 34.2M^{2.4}=32000M##
So that way the equation involves only M and not L.
Oh duh, ok great, so I'm getting an M of about 132.50 M_sun
 
Nathanael said:
Ellie specified that M and L were in solar units (hence Msun=1 and Lsun=1) so the expression is the same.

@Ellie Snyder
You solved for M in terms of L_star, but L_star is unknown, so that isn't a useful thing to do.

I think you've realized that the maximum mass occurs when L_star = L_Edd, right? So then algebraically you can just equate those two expressions:
##L_{star}=L_{Edd}\Rightarrow 34.2M^{2.4}=32000M##
So that way the equation involves only M and not L.
So for part b, to find that minimum mass, would I insert the quasar's 10^13 L_sun luminosity into the first equation and solve for M?
 
Ellie Snyder said:
So for part b, to find that minimum mass, would I insert the quasar's 10^13 L_sun luminosity into the first equation and solve for M?
I think so, but to be honest, I don't entirely understand the physics behind that situation; it seems like some subtleties are being neglected.
 
I have the same questions, just put into a different scenario... I ended up taking the 1.4 root of 3.2x10^4 over 34.2 for an answer of 266, 000kg. Because i rounded to 133 Msun which makes 133x2x10^3kg...Is this completely off? My professor said I was right on... but now I am wondering if I should just leave it as 133Msun...?
 
  • #10
WHY do I over think everything? Its the same damn thing... nevermind me I'm just arguing with myself...
As usual...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K