Using Energy Conservation to solve this problem: Jumping on a spring scale

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations related to jumping on a spring scale and the resulting spring compression. The initial equation used is 760(1+X)=0.5kX², which leads to confusion regarding the solution manual's equation of 760=0.5kX²-760X. Participants clarify that by rearranging the original equation and canceling terms, the correct form can be derived. There is also mention of a potential typing error in the solution manual, which misrepresents the sign of X. The conversation highlights the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in solving physics problems.
r12214001
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
my cal:760(1+X)=0.5kX²
Relevant Equations
760(1+X)=0.5kX²
I suppose spring compression to be X when jumpping from 1m. Therefore gravational potential mgh=760(1+X) and my cal:760(1+X)=0.5kX²
why the solution manual state that 760=0.5kX²+760X

1584262353555.png

圖片1.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
r12214001 said:
I suppose spring compression to be X when jumpping from 1m. Therefore gravational potential mgh=760(1+X) and my cal:760(1+X)=0.5kX²
why the solution manual state that 760=0.5kX²-760X
Algebra.

Start with$$760(1+X)=0.5kX^2$$ and subtract ##760X## from both sides to get $$760(1+X)-760X=0.5kX^2-760X$$Now on the left hand side notice that you can cancel that 760X and get $$760=0.5kX^2-760X$$
 
jbriggs444 said:
Algebra.

Start with$$760(1+X)=0.5kX^2$$ and subtract ##760X## from both sides to get $$760(1+X)-760X=0.5kX^2-760X$$Now on the left hand side notice that you can cancel that 760X and get $$760=0.5kX^2-760X$$
typing error
solution manual state that 760=0.5kX²+760X
 
r12214001 said:
typing error
solution manual state that 760=0.5kX²+760X
The solution manual took ##X## to be negative.
 
PS my bathroom scales only go up to about ##150kg## or ##1,500N##. I'm not able to test this out.
 
  • Haha
Likes etotheipi
PeroK said:
PS my bathroom scales only go up to about ##150kg## or ##1,500N##. I'm not able to test this out.
OK i didnt notice that. thanks for correction
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top