Using Parity operator for addition/subtraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter guyvsdcsniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Parity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the parity operator in Quantum Mechanics, specifically addressing the equations ##\Pi xf(\vec r)+x\Pi f(\vec r)=0## and ##\Pi xyf(\vec r)-xy\Pi f(\vec r)##. The user seeks validation of their approach to solving these equations, indicating that the first part was successfully resolved. Feedback from other users highlights a minor error in notation, specifically a missing parenthesis in the second equation. This emphasizes the importance of precision in mathematical expressions within Quantum Mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the parity operator in quantum systems
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and operations
  • Knowledge of functions and vector notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the parity operator in Quantum Mechanics
  • Explore advanced mathematical techniques used in Quantum Mechanics
  • Review common errors in mathematical notation and their implications in physics
  • Investigate the role of operators in quantum equations and their interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Students of Quantum Mechanics, physicists focusing on mathematical methods, and anyone interested in the application of operators in quantum theory.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Prove Πxf(r)+xΠfr)=0.
Compute Πxyf(r)-xyΠf(r):
Relevant Equations
Parity Operator
This is for a Quantum Mechanics class but part b of this question seemed like it relied more on math than physics so I think it appropriate to post here. If not, Mods please move to appropriate place.
Screen Shot 2022-10-08 at 7.06.05 PM.png


For the ##\Pi xf(\vec r)+x\Pi f(\vec r)=0## I have my answer circled in red on the first image.
For ##\Pi xyf(\vec r)-xy\Pi f(\vec r)## I have my answer attached to the 2nd image.

Im not sure if I am approaching this correctly. I just followed the actions listed in the question, and it seems like the first part worked out so the same logic should apply to the 2nd part?

Looking to see If I have the right approach here or any feedback if available.
IMG_1681.jpg
IMG_1682.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't mean to nitpick, but you seem to have a parentheses missing on the second line; just left of )=0
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K