Vacuum force factors (vacuum created by a "flow through" liquid)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the factors influencing the vacuum created by a liquid flowing through a larger container and its effect on a smaller diameter input tube submerged in the liquid. Participants explore the roles of surface area, depth, and hydrostatic pressure in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the vacuum is limited by atmospheric pressure and the vapor pressure of the liquid.
  • It is suggested that the surface area of the container does not significantly affect the vacuum, as pressure is defined as force per area.
  • Others argue that the depth, density, and hydrostatic pressure of the liquid are the most critical factors, as these determine the force exerted per unit area, which increases with depth.
  • A participant explains that as liquid flows out of the tank, the air layer expands, reducing pressure and allowing liquid to be "sucked" up the tube until equilibrium is reached between the depths in the pipe and tank.
  • Another participant adds a sidenote about the behavior of liquid in the absence of air, suggesting that if the pipe and tank were completely filled with liquid, the liquid would not drain out but would instead flow down the pipe until air entered to equalize pressures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of surface area versus depth in creating a vacuum, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of liquids under varying conditions and the implications of hydrostatic pressure, which may not be fully resolved.

Ralphamale01
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How is vacuum related to surface area?
Greetings all,

I'm new here and hope I'm asking this in the correct thread. So, the question is; where you have a vacuum created by a "flow through" liquid witin a large diameter container exerting suction force upon a smaller diameter input tube submerged in a liquid, does the surface area of the container determine how much vacuum is developed, or is the depth (weight) of liquid in container an equal, greater or minimal factor? Please see attached sketch. Thank in advance for any help.
 

Attachments

  • pic 01.gif
    pic 01.gif
    2.5 KB · Views: 193
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

A vacuum is limited by atmospheric pressure, and the vapour pressure of the liquid.

The area of the wall is NOT important, because pressure is a force per area.

The most important thing is the depth, density and hydrostatic pressure. That is the force of liquid per unit area, which increases with depth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatics#Pressure_in_fluids_at_rest
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.

A vacuum is limited by atmospheric pressure, and the vapour pressure of the liquid.

The area of the wall is NOT important, because pressure is a force per area.

The most important thing is the depth, density and hydrostatic pressure. That is the force of liquid per unit area, which increases with depth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatics#Pressure_in_fluids_at_rest
Understood, Thank You!
 
In hydraulics, life is very easy because the pressure varies within the liquid simply in proportion to the depth.
So in your case, as liquid flows out the tank, the air layer gets expanded, its pressure reduces and water is "sucked" up the tube. This can continue until the depth of water in the pipe matches the depth of water in the tank.
The pressure in the air pocket will have reduced by the depth x density of liquid, so now the atmospheric pressure is just enough to stop the liquid pushing out of the tank and to support the liquid in the tube.

As an interesting (IMO) sidenote, if there had not been any air pocket at all - the pipe and tank had started completely filled with liquid - then the liquid would not drain out of the tank at the bottom, rather the liquid would flow down the pipe. Air would enter the tank from below until it had filled the horizontal pipe and enough of the vertical pipe to equalise the depths in pipe and tank.
 
Merlin3189 said:
In hydraulics, life is very easy because the pressure varies within the liquid simply in proportion to the depth.
So in your case, as liquid flows out the tank, the air layer gets expanded, its pressure reduces and water is "sucked" up the tube. This can continue until the depth of water in the pipe matches the depth of water in the tank.
The pressure in the air pocket will have reduced by the depth x density of liquid, so now the atmospheric pressure is just enough to stop the liquid pushing out of the tank and to support the liquid in the tube.

As an interesting (IMO) sidenote, if there had not been any air pocket at all - the pipe and tank had started completely filled with liquid - then the liquid would not drain out of the tank at the bottom, rather the liquid would flow down the pipe. Air would enter the tank from below until it had filled the horizontal pipe and enough of the vertical pipe to equalise the depths in pipe and tank.
Thank you Merlin for your kind reply!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K