Validity of application of Coulomb's Law with moving charge?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Coulomb's Law, specifically the equation F = qE, in scenarios involving moving charges. It is established that while Coulomb's Law is strictly valid for static charges, it can be applied to moving charges under certain conditions, such as when the speed of the charges is significantly lower than the speed of light. The presence of magnetic fields can be neglected in introductory problems if the charges are treated as static from their own frame of reference. However, in cases involving multiple moving charges, such as a proton and an electron accelerating towards each other, the effects of magnetic forces and radiation must be considered for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law and electrostatic force calculations
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential energy
  • Concept of relativistic effects in charge motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of moving charges in electric fields using "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson
  • Explore the role of magnetic fields in charge interactions with "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by Griffiths
  • Investigate the effects of radiation on accelerating charges in "The Classical Theory of Fields" by Landau and Lifshitz
  • Learn about the limitations of classical physics in high-speed scenarios through "Quantum Electrodynamics" resources
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, electrical engineering, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the dynamics of charged particles in electric fields.

Alexander83
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I'm trying to brush up on some of my E&M and am comparing treatments of Coulomb's Law in introductory calculus-based texts with higher level material. My understanding was that Coulomb's Law (and by extension, calculation of the electrostatic force on a charged particle using F = qE) was really strictly only valid when the charges were perfectly static. My understanding is that this is due to the fact that magnetic forces arise when there is motion of charges and as well that there are retardation effects if electric fields vary rapidly. I've run into two problems in these introductory texts that have me questioning some of my understanding of electrostatics.

Problem #1

A common problem that is introduced in first-year textbooks is the case of a moving charge like an electron undergoing projectile motion while in a uniform E-field. This is usually treated by considering the moving charge, working out the net force from the constant electric field and calculating characteristics of the trajectory under similar considerations to projectile motion. My question is concerning the validity of using the F = qE equation in this context.

This is clearly not a purely static situation, but my supposition is that it works because there is only the one charge moving around and all of the other source charges remain fixed so from the perspective of the mobile charge it's a "static" situation. As well, from the perspective of the one mobile charge, the other charges would not be in motion, so there ought to be no magnetic fields acting on it, and thus the magnetic force can be neglected. Is this interpretation correct or are there additional factors that are being papered over at an introductory level?

Problem #2

A second common type of problem is introduced along with the electrical potential energy for point charges. It involves two charged particles (such as a proton and an electron) that are released from rest and are allowed to accelerate towards each other and the problem asks to determine the speed of the particles when they are a certain distance apart. Here, magnetic forces surely cannot be neglected (since there are two moving charges), but is it still reasonable to solve this type of problem just using the concept of changes in electrical potential energy? Does this really give the correct answer even if magnetic effects are present? I would imagine that there would also have to be some loss of energy due to the production of radiation as the charges accelerate?

I would greatly appreciate if anyone out there could add any clarity to these questions and point out any misconceptions I have.

Thanks!

Alexander.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexander83 said:
My question is concerning the validity of using the F = qE equation in this context.
That is perfectly valid in the frame where the electric field is static.
From the perspective of the charge moving through the lab, the capacitor plates are moving and things are more complicated.

#2
Neglecting the magnetic field and assuming the electric field to perfectly follow the charges is a good approximation as long as the speed of the particles is slow compared to the speed of light. At a point where this is can become wrong you need quantum mechanics anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alexander83
Thank you, mfb. Your answer makes good sense and helps a lot!

Cheers, Alex.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
895
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K