High School Validity of hydrostatic pressure equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter pgirl1729
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The hydrostatic pressure equation, P=hρg, is derived from the fundamental relationship P=F/A, where F represents the weight of the fluid (mg) and A is the cross-sectional area. Despite the downward force of weight, pressure in fluids acts in all directions due to the nature of fluids at equilibrium, which cannot sustain shear stress. This phenomenon is illustrated by examples such as water balloons and connected pipes, where pressure is uniformly distributed. The discussion emphasizes that while weight acts downward, the resultant pressure is omnidirectional, maintaining equilibrium within the fluid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure and its equation P=hρg
  • Basic knowledge of fluid mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Pascal's Law
  • Concept of equilibrium in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Pascal's Law and its applications in fluid mechanics
  • Explore Torricelli's Law for understanding fluid flow dynamics
  • Learn about the properties of fluids under pressure and their behavior in equilibrium
  • Investigate the implications of shear stress in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers working with fluid systems, and anyone interested in the principles of hydrostatics and fluid mechanics.

pgirl1729
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
The hydrostatic pressure equation, P=hρg is derived from P=F/A where F=mg and A=cross sectional area of the water column. As weight only acts downwards and it's force is only exerted in downward direction. Then why does pressure acts in all directions? How is the P=hρg still valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pgirl1729 said:
The hydrostatic pressure equation, P=hρg is derived from P=F/A where F=mg and A=cross sectional area of the water column. As weight only acts downwards and it's force is only exerted in downward direction. Then why does pressure acts in all directions? How is the P=hρg still valid?
A short and not very revealing answer is that fluids are fluid. At equilibrium, they cannot sustain a shear stress. [Stress is a generalization of pressure that one may eventually learn about]

Perhaps more appealing is to think about a water balloon. If you press down on its top, it expands out the sides. Your top pressure has become a side pressure.

Or consider a vertical pipe connected by an elbow to a horizontal pipe. Seal the horizontal pipe at its free end. Fill the pipes with water and apply pressure at the top. Would you agree that the longitudinal pressure in both pipe segments should be the same? Remove the pipes and replace them with a bath of water. Maintain the pressure on the top of the bath. Would you expect the pressure anywhere to change?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes davenn, russ_watters and pgirl1729
pgirl1729 said:
As weight only acts downwards and it's force is only exerted in downward direction. Then why does pressure acts in all directions?

The weight of the balls in the below image is also only exerted in downward direction, and yet they will push sideways against the walls. You don't need complex fluid dynamics to understand the basic principle qualitatively.

hex_packing.png
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Pisica
pgirl1729 said:
Then why does pressure acts in all directions? How is the P=hρg still valid?
The pressure on which the water column fron the left is "pressed" is equal to the pressure with which it is fron the right and they cancel each other out.
 
Pisica said:
The pressure on which the water column fron the left is "pressed" is equal to the pressure with which it is fron the right and they cancel each other out.
Yes. This is a correct observation. If we imagine a small parcel of water (perhaps a cube), the force from the left will match the force from the right. So there is no net force in that direction. The parcel remains at rest, not accelerating.

This must be the case if the fluid is in an equilibrium state.

This is the sense in which the left and right pressures "cancel out". It is not that there is no pressure. It is that there is no acceleration of the fluid parcel.
 
Thread 'A high school physics problem demonstrating relative motion'
I remembered a pretty high school problem from kinematics. But it seems it can help even undergraduates to develop their understanding of what a relative motion is. Consider a railway circle of radius ##r##. Assume that a carriage running along this circle has a speed ##v##. See the picture. A fly ##M## flies in the opposite direction and has a speed ##u,\quad |OM|=b##. Find a speed of the fly relative to the carriage. The obvious incorrect answer is ##u+v## while the correct answer is...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K