Ted123
- 428
- 0
[PLAIN]http://img863.imageshack.us/img863/9868/heaviside.png
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion centers on the validity of piecewise differentiation for functions with discontinuities, specifically addressing the function defined as f(x) = {-1, x < -1; x, -1 ≤ x ≤ 1; 1, x > 1}. It is established that the original function is not continuous due to undefined points at x = -1 and x = 1. However, when redefined as mentioned, the function becomes continuous, allowing for valid first and second derivatives. The primary inquiry is whether piecewise differentiation remains applicable despite the discontinuities in the original function.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, calculus students, educators, and anyone interested in the nuances of differentiation in the context of piecewise functions and discontinuities.
HallsofIvy said:Are you sure the function is defined as you say? Yes, as given, f is NOT continuous because it is not defined at x= -1 and at x= 1.
If the function were defined as
[tex]f(x)= \left{\begin{array}{cc} -1, & x<-1 \\ x, & -1\le x\le 1 \\ 1, & x> 1\end{array}[/tex]
then it would be continuous and the first and second derivatives exactly as you say.