Value of energy-momentum tensor in weak field approximations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the energy-momentum tensor in general relativity and the weak field approximations, particularly in the context of the Schwarzschild metric and Poisson's equation. Participants explore the implications of a vacuum solution versus a source-filled region, specifically using the example of the gravitational field around the Sun.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why textbooks state that T=\rho c² when approximating Poisson's equation, given that the Schwarzschild metric is a vacuum solution (T_{\mu\nu}=0).
  • Another participant explains that in Newtonian gravitation, the gravitational potential inside the Sun follows Poisson's equation with a non-zero mass density, while outside it follows Laplace's equation with zero density.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the apparent contradiction between T^{00}=\rho c² and the existence of a Schwarzschild solution with T^{\mu\nu}=0.
  • One reply suggests that the Schwarzschild solution can be likened to a point charge with an infinite stress-energy tensor at a singularity, being zero elsewhere, thus not contradicting the vacuum condition.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to understand the contexts of Poisson's and Laplace's equations, noting that Laplace's equation is a special case of Poisson's equation.
  • A participant clarifies that the approximation of Poisson's equation with T=\rho c² applies to points inside a gravitational source, while the Schwarzschild solution pertains to points outside where T=0.
  • Further confusion arises regarding the assumption that the Sun can be treated as "dust" in the Newtonian limit, despite its internal pressure, leading to a discussion about the validity of this assumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and uncertainties regarding the relationship between the energy-momentum tensor and the Schwarzschild solution. There is no consensus on the validity of treating the Sun as "dust" or on the implications of the vacuum solution versus the source-filled region.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity on the conditions under which Poisson's and Laplace's equations apply, as well as the assumptions made in the derivation of the Newtonian limit. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and assumptions that remain unresolved.

peter46464
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
My first question, so sorry if it's in the wrong forum.

I'm trying to understand the Newtonian weak field approximations to general relativity. I can't see why, if the Schwarzschild metric (which can describe the gravitational field around the Sun) is a vacuum solution ([itex]T_{\mu\nu}=0[/itex] ) , do textbooks state that [itex]T=\rho c^{2}[/itex] when approximating Poisson's Equation (which also describes the gravitational field around the Sun) from the Einstein Field Equations?

Thank you .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Newtonian gravitation the gravitational potential inside the sun obeys Poisson's equation, ∇2 = -4π Gρ where the mass density ρ ≠ 0. Outside the sun ρ = 0 and we have Laplace's equation ∇2 = 0. General Relativity works the same way except the source is the stress energy tensor Tμν, or in the case of the sun just T00 = ρc2.
 
Sorry, I still don't see why if [itex]T^{00}=\rho c[/itex] there can be a Schwarzschild solution for [itex]T^{\mu\nu}=0[/itex] . Why aren't these two contradictory statements?
 
I'm not positive I understand your difficulty, but I'll take a guess. Said guess being that you're cofused by how you can get gravity if T_uv = 0 everywhere.

If you look at a Newtonian point charge, the charge density is zero everywhere except for the point, where the charge density is infinite.

So except for one singular point, the charge density is 0.

The Schwarzschild solution is vaguely similar in that you have an infinite singular stress-energy tensor at the center (the sigularity), and it's zero everywhere else, i.e. a vacuuum.
 
Take a look at Bill's post again. In order to understand the answer to your question you have to understand the two different situations Possion, and Laplace's equations hold. Laplace's equation talks about a region of space that is void of sources, Possion's equation describes a region that has sources in that region.

Take the Schwarzschild metric, it is a solution of
[tex] R_{\alpha\beta}=0[/tex]
Now take the weak field metric, and without any assumptions for now about the sources, to order in [itex]1/c^2[/itex], what does the Einstein tensor reduce to? Now what are the conditions we should put on [itex]T_{\alpha\beta}[/itex] to make our Newtonian limit make sense?

Do you see how Laplace's equation is a special case of Possion's equation?
 
So when we approximate Poisson's equation

[itex]\nabla\cdot\nabla\phi=4\pi G\rho[/itex]

by assuming [itex]T=\rho c^{2}[/itex]

we are doing it for a point inside a gravitational source (eg the Sun).

However, the Schwarzschild solution is for points outside a gravitational source, where [itex]T=0[/itex]

I think the fog may be clearing a little.

But one new confusion. When I read my textbook I see that the derivation of the Newtonian limit is based on the assumption that we are dealing with a region filled with dust (ie no internal pressure). So we are assuming (still using the Sun as our example) that the Sun is “dust”. How is that a valid assumption? When I think of the Sun I think of this great seething mass of gas, with lots of pressure. So it's OK to assume that, even if for the Sun that
[itex]pressure\ll density[/itex]

?

Thanks for persevering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
984
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K