I Van der Waals attractive force: Why don't the imbalances average out?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the transient shift in electron density that leads to Van der Waals forces, which occur at distances of 0.4 to 0.6 nanometers between atoms. This shift creates a temporary charge that can attract or repel nearby atoms. The average interactions are considered through the sum of various strengths based on angles and distances. When two close spheres experience polarization, the induced charges lead to an attraction between them. The concept of induction is highlighted as a key factor in understanding these interactions.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,754
Reaction score
243
TL;DR
When a van der Waals force between two objects is attractive (before getting too close), it is due to the variable distribution of electrical charge between the molecules. But why wouldn't this variation average out (+ + /+ -/- +/- -) to give zero?
The summary refers, for example, to the Wikipedia explanation
"The force results from a transient shift in electron density. Specifically, the electron density may temporarily shift more greatly to one side of the nucleus. This generates a transient charge to which a nearby atom can be either attracted or repelled."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_der_Waals_force

(for a distance between atoms of between 0.4 to 0.6 nanometers, as explained in that article)

Also, when I speak of the average (+ + /+ -/- +/- -) , this would include the sum (integral) of all the different strengths according to the angles, distances, etc. But the idea is still the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider two close spheres, (±) (±). One becomes momentarily polarised, +()– (±). The other sphere then takes an induced polarisation in the same direction, +()– +()–. The closest points on the spheres have opposite charge so attraction dominates.
 
Thank you, Baluncore. I had not considered induction. Question answered! :smile:
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
65K