Vaporization pressure in a fuel can

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the vaporization pressure in a plastic jerry can used for gasoline and how to manage it during storage. It concludes that filling the can nearly full minimizes pressure increases due to vaporization, as a non-rigid can allows for slight expansion, countering pressure increases. However, if the can is rigid and filled completely, significant pressure can develop due to thermal expansion differences between the fuel and the can material. Ultimately, the pressure in the headspace is the sum of the air pressure and the vapor pressure of the fuel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vapor pressure and its relationship with temperature
  • Knowledge of thermal expansion principles
  • Familiarity with the properties of materials, specifically plastics and their rigidity
  • Basic concepts of gas laws and pressure dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of thermal expansion in liquids and solids
  • Learn about vapor pressure and its implications in fuel storage
  • Investigate the properties of different materials used in fuel containers
  • Explore safety guidelines for storing flammable liquids in various containers
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, safety professionals, and anyone involved in the storage and handling of flammable liquids, particularly those working with fuel containers.

Anders L
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A normal behavior of a plastic jerry can used for gasoline is that it expands by the pressure caused by vaporization of the gas.

Which option below will be the best alternative to reduce the pressure caused by vaporization in a jerry can during storage? :

- Fill up the can as much as possible

- Fill up to let say 80% of the total volume, leaving some air at the top

Regards Anders
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the vapour pressure depends only on the temperature, so my guess is that the fluid level won't have any effect.

Cheers,
Terry
 
If one treats the can as being perfectly rigid, that is correct -- the fluid level will not have any effect. The increase in pressure will be exactly equal to the vapor pressure of the fuel.

If the can is non-rigid then leaving a lesser amount of head room means that a small expansion in the can results in a (relatively) larger expansion in the head room. So the expected increase in pressure due to vaporization of the fuel is countered by a slight expansion in the can and the pressure only increases slightly.

So... in the real world my answer would be to fill the can nearly full up.

However... if the coefficient of thermal expansion of the fuel is different than the coefficient of thermal expansion of the can and if the can is very rigid and if the temperature rises or falls then a completely full can could be subject to very large pressures. (e.g. consider what happens to a glass bottle completely full of water in the freezer). Jerry cans are not that rigid. Still, it can be unwise to fill a rigid container completely.
 
I think that even in the non rigid container case the pressure will always settle at the vapour pressure for the temperature.

Cheers,
Terry
 
Not if there is any air in the head space.
 
OK.
Could you please provide the "why is it so"?

Cheers,
Terry
 
The pressure in the head space is the sum of the air pressure plus the vapor pressure. When you initially tighten the lid on the can the head space is full of air at atmospheric pressure. Fuel eventually evaporates so that the partial pressure of fuel vapor in the head space is equal to the vapor pressure of the fuel at the current temperature. But the air is still there, so the resulting pressure will be strictly higher than the vapor pressure alone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
907
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K