Varation of Parameters fun diff EQ question, where do i go next?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation using the method of Variation of Parameters. The specific equation is y'' + 15y' + 56y = 54e^(-5t), with initial conditions y(0) = 8 and y'(0) = 2. Participants are exploring the steps to find a particular solution and how it relates to the general solution of the homogeneous equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss integrating functions u1 and u2, and how to combine these with the general solution of the homogeneous equation. There is confusion about the terminology used, particularly regarding the homogeneity of the original equation. Some participants suggest different methods, including the method of undetermined coefficients and reduction of order, while questioning the rationale behind specific guesses for particular solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their approaches and reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration of functions and the formulation of particular solutions. There are multiple interpretations of the steps involved, and participants are engaging with each other's ideas without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of initial conditions and the specific form of the differential equation. There is mention of a homework platform being down, which may affect the ability to verify solutions.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Varation of Parameters fun! diff EQ question, where do i go next?

This is my first attempt at doing Variation of parameters, didn't go to bad, things cancled out pretty well but now I'm almost done but I'm stuck!
The problem says: Find the solution of y''+15y'+56y = 54*e^(-5t), with y(0) = 8, and y'(0) = 2, y = ?

Here is my work:
http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/6798/s2ly.jpg


http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/6389/s26za.jpg

If you don't follow me or see an error right off the bat, please let me know! Thanks! :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Now integrate u1= -54e3t and u2'= 54e2t to find u1 and u2 of course! Once you know those put them into "u1e-8t+ u2e-7t to get a "specific solution" and add that to the general solution of the homogenous equation.
 
ahh thanks Ivey, I'm alittle confused on what u mean when u said add it to the homogenous equation, the orginal equation wasn't homogenous was set equal to 54e^(-5t), are you saying add it to the r^2+15r+56 = 0? Thanks here is what i got now:
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/848/lastscan1ia.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, that's pretty much the whole idea! If y(t)= C_1e^{-8t}+ C_2e^{-7t} is the general solution to y"+ 15y'+ 56y= 0 and y(t)= 9e^{-5t} satisfies y"+ 15y'+ 56y= 54e-5t, then
The general solution to y"+ 15y'+56y= 54e-5t is
y(t)= C_1e^{-8t}+ C_2e^{-7t}+ 9e^{-5t}.
 
Thanks again Ivey!
I don't know if its right because webhw is still down, yay!
but this is what I got:
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/6418/lastscan3jq.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I personally think it's easier to solve it like this: First, as usual, you solve the homogeneous equation which is basically setting the right hand side (RHS) to zero, i.e. y"+ 15y'+56y=0. This will give you y_{h}(t)=C_1e^{-8t}+ C_2e^{-7t}. Next you solve the "special" or "particular" equation by making an ansatz (educated guess) depending on what expression you have on the RHS. In this case I would choose the ansatz y_{p}(t)=Ae^{-5t}. Differentiate this and insert into the original equation gives you a value on A. The total solution is simply y=y_{h}+y_{p}. And then use your initial conditions to get the values of C_1 and C_2.

Sound complicated, but that's how I used to solve these things. :smile:

And yes, I too got C_1=-40 and C_2=39.
 
i like ur method a lot better! But how did you make an educational guess of y_{p}(t)=Ae^{-5t} ? I understand why u would guess an e^(t) but how did u konw it should be e^(-5t)? Thanks!
 
You can find out more about that method if you look up 'method of undetermined coefficients.' I find that reduction of order is generally faster because you don't need to memorise specific forms for certain situations.
 
I made the ansatz y_{p}(t)=Ae^{-5t} because the the RHS of the original equation had the exponential term e^{-5t}. More generally, I could have chosen the ansatz y_{p}(t)=Ae^{-5t}+Be^{+5t} but the second term is redundant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K