Variation of (pore pressure) due to consolidation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the variation of pore pressure due to consolidation in soil, specifically questioning why the pore pressure profile appears parabolic rather than linear with depth. Participants reference Terzaghi and Peck's classic model, which explains that both solid and fluid loads increase with depth, leading to a parabolic curve in pore pressure distribution. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the equilibrium between solid and fluid loads in soil mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of soil mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Terzaghi and Peck's consolidation theory
  • Knowledge of pore pressure concepts in geotechnical engineering
  • Ability to interpret graphs related to soil pressure distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Terzaghi and Peck's consolidation theory in detail
  • Learn about pore pressure measurement techniques in soil
  • Explore the effects of loading conditions on soil behavior
  • Investigate numerical modeling of pore pressure distribution in soils
USEFUL FOR

Geotechnical engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in soil analysis and consolidation studies will benefit from this discussion.

tzx9633

Homework Statement


In the last picture , we can see that at time between 0 and infinity , the variation of pore pressure across depth is parabolic curve , why is it so ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it's incorrect . I think it should be linearly decrease with depth . This is because the top part will receive max force from the applied force . The influnece of force decrease with the depth
 

Attachments

  • 738.PNG
    738.PNG
    35.4 KB · Views: 549
  • 740.png
    740.png
    36.5 KB · Views: 492
  • 741.png
    741.png
    32.9 KB · Views: 525
  • 742.png
    742.png
    33.6 KB · Views: 571
  • 743.png
    743.png
    16.3 KB · Views: 521
Physics news on Phys.org
tzx9633 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it's incorrect . I think it should be linearly decrease with depth . This is because the top part will receive max force from the applied force . The influnece of force decrease with the depth
I'm not completely clear what you are saying here. What are you conceiving as the source of the applied force? You have two components: loading from the solid portion of the soil, sediment or rock and loading from the fluid content of the pore space. In an equilibrium situation the solid load is supported by the soil/rock and the fluid load by the pore space content. Both of these are proportional to depth and increase with depth, not decrease, as you appear to suggest.

One of your diagrams looks like the classic model from Terzaghi and Peck's classic paper published 50+ years ago, which describes a non-equilibrium condition and relates to the parabolic curve you have been asked to account for.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
Ophiolite said:
I'm not completely clear what you are saying here. What are you conceiving as the source of the applied force? You have two components: loading from the solid portion of the soil, sediment or rock and loading from the fluid content of the pore space. In an equilibrium situation the solid load is supported by the soil/rock and the fluid load by the pore space content. Both of these are proportional to depth and increase with depth, not decrease, as you appear to suggest.

One of your diagrams looks like the classic model from Terzaghi and Peck's classic paper published 50+ years ago, which describes a non-equilibrium condition and relates to the parabolic curve you have been asked to account for.
if it's increasign down the depth , why the graph of pore pressure has parabolic shape ? Sholdnt it has a straight line graph ?
 
Ophiolite said:
I'm not completely clear what you are saying here. What are you conceiving as the source of the applied force? You have two components: loading from the solid portion of the soil, sediment or rock and loading from the fluid content of the pore space. In an equilibrium situation the solid load is supported by the soil/rock and the fluid load by the pore space content. Both of these are proportional to depth and increase with depth, not decrease, as you appear to suggest.

One of your diagrams looks like the classic model from Terzaghi and Peck's classic paper published 50+ years ago, which describes a non-equilibrium condition and relates to the parabolic curve you have been asked to account for.
Is there anything wrong with the notes ? If so , then , why the graph has parabolic shape ?
 
I need to take a thorough look at all the material. I'll aim to get back to you within 24hours. It would be helpful to know what context this is in. Are you considering soils (which I know little about) or sediments (where I have a pretty solid grounding)?
 
Ophiolite said:
I need to take a thorough look at all the material. I'll aim to get back to you within 24hours. It would be helpful to know what context this is in. Are you considering soils (which I know little about) or sediments (where I have a pretty solid grounding)?
Hi , it the soil . Do you have any updates now ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K