Variation of saturation photocurrent with intensity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of saturation photocurrent in photoelectric experiments when varying light frequency while keeping intensity constant. It is established that increasing anode potential initially raises photocurrent until saturation is reached, at which point the saturation current increases with light intensity. However, the confusion arises when frequency is increased at constant intensity, leading to a decrease in the number of photons per unit time, which contradicts the assertion that saturation photocurrent remains unchanged. This paradox is rooted in Einstein's photon model, which explains the energy dynamics of photons in relation to electron liberation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photoelectric effect principles
  • Familiarity with Einstein's photon model
  • Knowledge of photon energy calculations (E = hf)
  • Basic concepts of saturation current in photoelectric experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between photon frequency and energy in the context of the photoelectric effect
  • Explore the implications of saturation current in various light intensities
  • Investigate the role of electron bonding energies in photoelectric experiments
  • Examine experimental setups that demonstrate the saturation photocurrent behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and the photoelectric effect, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to photon energy and electron liberation.

enkriya
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
  1. 1. In photoelectric experiment, if anode potential w.r.t. cathode is increased, photocurrent first increases then becomes a constant, since all the photoelctorns ejected from cathode are collected at anode. If we increase the intensity of light at this point, the 'saturation current' increases because number of photons incident per unit time increases. Now the problem is, if we increase the frequncy now keeping the intensity constant, that would mean we are decreasing number of photons incident per unit time, which should result in reduction of current.
Number of photons per unit time = IA/hf .

It is clear that number of photons strking per unit time will decrease, and current must drcrease. However every textbook of physics that i have states that saturation photocurrent will not change when frequncy is changed but intensity is kept constant.

http://dronstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/124.jpg
In this graph, frequencies are different but intensity is same. By my logic, saturation current should be different. But is shown to be same for all frequencies.
Any ideas/ solutions are welcome. Thankyou for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rude man (Nice nickname). Thanks for reply. The question is not about photodiodes. It is about photelectric experiment. The results of photoeectric experiment were explained by Einstein's photon model. The experiment completely follows photon energy model.
 
enkriya said:
Hi rude man (Nice nickname). Thanks for reply. The question is not about photodiodes. It is about photelectric experiment. The results of photoeectric experiment were explained by Einstein's photon model. The experiment completely follows photon energy model.
Oh, OK, sorry. Gotta look into this more. Meanwhile, others will undoubtedly help.
 
Last edited:
Could you cite a reference saying what you said? In your graph, are you sure intensity is kept constant?
 
Another thought: The weakest photons will liberate electrons close to the outermost orbital only. But it takes higher-energy photons to lberate electrons with larger bonding energies. So the higher-energy photons liberate electrons not liberatable by the lower-frequency photons. So the lower number of photons per unit time is compensated by the ability of those higher-energy photons to liberate deeper-situated electrons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K