The variation of the Einstein Hilbert action is usually done in coordinate basis where there is a crucial divergence term one can neglect which arise in the variation of the Ricci tensor, and is given by ##g^{ab}\delta R_{ab} = \nabla_c w^c## where(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$w^c = g^{ab}(g^{db} \delta \Gamma^{c}_{db} - g^{cb} \delta\Gamma^c_{db})$$.

However, when one varies in a noncoordinate basis, one supposedly (see link below) get's an extra term and arrive at

$$g^{ab}\delta R_{ab} = \nabla_c w^c - C^c_{cd} \delta \Gamma^d_{ab}g^{ab}.$$

How is this result derived?

My calculations so far is the following: From the Riemann tensor in a noncoordinate basis ##\{e_a \}## with structure constants ##[e_b, e_c] = C^a_{bc}e_a## given by

$$R^a_{bcd} = e_c \Gamma^a_{db} - e_d\Gamma^a_{cb} + \Gamma^f_{db} \Gamma^a_{cf} - \Gamma^f_{cb} \Gamma^a_{df} - C^f_{cd} \Gamma^a_{fb}$$

the variation yields

$$\delta R^a_{bcd} = e_c \delta \Gamma^a_{db} - e_d\delta \Gamma^a_{cb} + \delta\Gamma^f_{db} \Gamma^a_{cf} + \Gamma^f_{db} \delta\Gamma^a_{cf} - \delta\Gamma^f_{cb} \Gamma^a_{df} - \Gamma^f_{cb} \delta \Gamma^a_{df} - C^f_{cd} \delta \Gamma^a_{fb}- \delta C^f_{cd} \Gamma^a_{fb}$$

From here we can extract three terms of the respective covariant derivatives ##\nabla_d \delta \Gamma^a_{cb}## and ##\nabla_c \delta \Gamma^a_{db}##; however the terms ##\Gamma^f_{cd}\delta \Gamma^a_{fb}## and ##\Gamma^f_{dc} \delta \Gamma^a_{fb}## are not present. Taking these into account, I get

$$\delta R^a_{bcd} = \nabla_c \delta \Gamma^a_{db} - \nabla_d \delta \Gamma^a_{cb} + (\Gamma^f_{cd} - \Gamma^f_{dc}) \delta \Gamma^a_{fb} - C_{cd}^f\delta\Gamma^a_{fb} - \delta C_{cd}^f\Gamma^a_{fb}= \nabla_c \delta \Gamma^a_{db} - \nabla_d \delta \Gamma^a_{cb}- \delta C_{cd}^f\Gamma^a_{fb}.$$

If there are no error in my calculations, where do I go from here? Assuming I have done nothing wrong so far, it seems like one must achieve the equality ##\delta C_{cd}^f\Gamma^c_{fb} g^{db} = C^c_{cd} \delta \Gamma^d_{ab}g^{ab}##.. Any ideas on how this equality might be obtained?

Equation (2.9) in: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jmp/15/6/10.1063/1.1666735

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Variation of the Einstein-Hilbert action in noncoordinate basis

Loading...

Similar Threads - Variation Einstein Hilbert | Date |
---|---|

A Variation of scalar field action | Jan 21, 2018 |

A Derive the Bianchi identities from a variational principle? | Oct 5, 2017 |

A ambiguous variation of Einstein-Hilbert action | May 19, 2010 |

Variation of Einstein-Hilbert action | Dec 10, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**