Variational calculus Euler lagrange Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation within the context of variational calculus, specifically from the textbook "Applied Finite Element Analysis." The key point of confusion is the emergence of the factor of 1/2 in the integral transformation, which relates to the identity xdx = 1/2 d(x^2). Participants clarify that understanding functional derivatives simplifies the derivation process, revealing that the differentiation of functions and functionals share similar operational properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of variational calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Basic knowledge of functional derivatives
  • Experience with integral calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation in detail
  • Learn about functional derivatives and their applications
  • Explore examples of variational calculus in physics and engineering
  • Investigate the relationship between integrals and derivatives in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are looking to deepen their understanding of variational calculus and the Euler-Lagrange equation.

hash054
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand an example from my textbook "applied finite element analysis" and in the variational calculus, Euler lagrange equation example I can't seem to understand the following derivation in one of its examples
∫((dT/dx)(d(δT)/dx))dx= ∫((dT/dx)δ(dT/dx))dx= ∫((1/2)δ(dT/dx)^2)dx

limits from 0 to 5.

My question here is how in the last part of the derivation 1/2 appears out of the blue where the integratal remains intact..
If anyone know the answer.. kindly refer me some examples also
 
Physics news on Phys.org
essentially it is a restatement of: xdx = 1/2 d(x^2)
 
So this is a reverse step?
 
Hi All,
I found it easier to master the functional derivative concept by performing the calculations out, leaving aside for a moment the symbol $$\delta$$ to denote variations, a useful notation that might though hide the mechanics of what is going on.
Then your example becomes transparent: the functional derivative of the functional $$\int_{\Omega} y'^{2} \mathrm{d}\Omega$$ in the direction of the test function $$\mu$$ (in other terms, introducing a variation $$\hat{y} = y(x) + \epsilon \mu (x)$$ according to the definition equals
$$lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\frac {\int_{\Omega} [\hat{y}'^2 - y'^ 2] \mathrm{d}\Omega}{\epsilon}$$
$$lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\frac {\int_{\Omega} [{y'^{2} + 2\epsilon \mu' y'+\epsilon^2 \mu^{2}} - y' ^2] \mathrm{d}\Omega}{\epsilon}$$
some terms cancel, and you are left with the result you wnated to confirm: it turns out the differentiation of functions and functional share common operational properties, such as xdx = 1/2 d(x^2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K