Vector Cross Product With Its Curl

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the vector cross product and its relationship with the curl, specifically addressing the expression involving the gradient of \(A^2\). The key point is the application of the gradient operator to the term \(A \cdot A\), which yields two terms, necessitating the division by two to correctly express \(\nabla(A^2)\) as \(\nabla \frac{A^2}{2}\). This clarification resolves the confusion regarding the appearance of the factor of \(1/2\) in the identity being proven. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding index notation and the manipulation of vector calculus expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly the gradient and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with index notation and tensor calculus.
  • Knowledge of vector fields and their properties.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical derivations involving vectors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the curl operator in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the application of index notation in tensor analysis.
  • Explore the derivation of vector identities involving gradients and curls.
  • Investigate the implications of the product rule in vector calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those working with vector fields and seeking to deepen their understanding of vector calculus and its applications in mechanics and electromagnetism.

John Delaney
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Prove A X (∇ X A) = ∇(A²/2) - A · ∇A
Relevant Equations
εijk εlmk = δil δjm - δim δjl
Starting with LHS:

i εijk Aj (∇xA)k

i εijk εlmk Aj (d/dxl) Am

il δjm - δim δjl) Aj (d/dxl) Ami

δil δjm Aj (d/dxl) Ami - δim δjl Aj (d/dxl) Ami

Aj (d/dxi) Aji - Aj (d/dxj) Aii

At this point, the LHS should equal the RHS in the problem statement, but I have no clue where the 1/2 comes from...been trying to figure it out for the past few hours at this point. Rather, I get this and I'm not sure where my lapse in understanding is (I'm relatively new to index notation):

∇(A²) - A · ∇A
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the derivative of f(x)=x2/2?
Your expression here is analogous.
 
Notice that ##A^2 = A \cdot A##. When the gradient operator is applied to this term, you get two terms looking like this: ##A(\nabla A)##. In your initial work, you only have one of these terms, so to account for the duplicate, you must divide ##\nabla A^2## by two, which results in the term ##\nabla \frac{A^2}{2}## appearing in the identity you are attempting to prove.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K