Vector calculus index notation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
11 replies · 5K views
Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement



prove grad(a.grad(r^-1))= -curl(a cross grad (r^-1))

Homework Equations



curl(a x b)= (b dot grad)a - (a dot grad)b +a(div b) - b(div a )

The Attempt at a Solution


Im trying to use index notation and get
di (aj (grad(r^-1))j)
=grad(r^-1) di(aj) +aj(di grad(r^-1))j

which is obviously not right. I've tried attacking the problem from the reverse direction and haven't had much luck there either.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide more details? Is A a constant vector not dependent on r, theta, phi?

Have you looked at the vector identities in spherical coordinates for curl, div and grad?

Try to solve it without going to index notation.
 
jedishrfu said:
Try starting with ##\nabla( A \cdot B ) = (B \cdot \nabla ) A + (A \cdot \nabla) B + B \times (\nabla \times A) + A \times (\nabla \times B)##
Hi thank you for replying!
Sorry, a is a constant vector and r is (X,y,z)

I have not come across this identity. Any hints on how to prove it?
 
Physgeek64 said:

Homework Statement



prove grad(a.grad(r^-1))= -curl(a cross grad (r^-1))

Homework Equations



curl(a x b)= (b dot grad)a - (a dot grad)b +a(div b) - b(div a )

The Attempt at a Solution


Im trying to use index notation and get
di (aj (grad(r^-1))j)
=grad(r^-1) di(aj) +aj(di grad(r^-1))j

which is obviously not right. I've tried attacking the problem from the reverse direction and haven't had much luck there either.

Thank you :)

Time to learn some latex, I suggest!
 
jedishrfu said:
Here's a more complete list of identities:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus_identities

Off hand I don't know how to prove this particular identity but often when presented with a problem such as yours you can use the identities transform the left had side to the right hand side or vice versa.to "prove" it.
I think proving the identity was the purpose of the question? I could be wrong but it's to do with index notation
 
You problem has a specific function ##\nabla(1/r)## in it so its seemed to me that its not an identity but an example where you apply the identity to get the result you need to prove.

Its true I could be wrong here. Perhaps @Mark44 or @PeroK could comment more on this.
 
jedishrfu said:
You problem has a specific function ##\nabla(1/r)## in it so its seemed to me that its not an identity but an example where you apply the identity to get the result you need to prove.

Its true I could be wrong here. Perhaps @Mark44 or @PeroK could comment more on this.

I assumed it did depend on the second vector being ##\nabla(1/r)##. It must. I evaluated each side for the x-term (and then used symmetry). It's not too bad if you're careful with your differentiation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
PeroK said:
I assumed it did depend on the second vector being ##\nabla(1/r)##. It must. I evaluated each side for the x-term (and then used symmetry). It's not too bad if you're careful with your differentiation.

I checked with the second vector being ##\nabla f## and it reduces to Laplace's equation ##\nabla ^2 f = 0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
PeroK said:
I checked with the second vector being ##\nabla f## and it reduces to Laplace's equation ##\nabla ^2 f = 0##
Its okay, I've managed to do it with index notation. Thank you guys for helping though- I really appreciate it :)