Vector calculus index notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identity grad(a.grad(r^-1)) = -curl(a cross grad(r^-1)), with a focus on vector calculus and index notation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of index notation and vector identities, with some questioning the nature of the vector a and its dependence on spherical coordinates. Others suggest starting points for the proof and discuss the application of specific vector calculus identities.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of various approaches to the problem, with some participants providing identities and hints. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific function involved, grad(r^-1), and discuss assumptions regarding the vector a being constant. There is mention of the need for careful differentiation and the potential reduction to Laplace's equation in certain contexts.

Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement



prove grad(a.grad(r^-1))= -curl(a cross grad (r^-1))

Homework Equations



curl(a x b)= (b dot grad)a - (a dot grad)b +a(div b) - b(div a )

The Attempt at a Solution


Im trying to use index notation and get
di (aj (grad(r^-1))j)
=grad(r^-1) di(aj) +aj(di grad(r^-1))j

which is obviously not right. I've tried attacking the problem from the reverse direction and haven't had much luck there either.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide more details? Is A a constant vector not dependent on r, theta, phi?

Have you looked at the vector identities in spherical coordinates for curl, div and grad?

Try to solve it without going to index notation.
 
Try starting with ##\nabla( A \cdot B ) = (B \cdot \nabla ) A + (A \cdot \nabla) B + B \times (\nabla \times A) + A \times (\nabla \times B)##
 
jedishrfu said:
Try starting with ##\nabla( A \cdot B ) = (B \cdot \nabla ) A + (A \cdot \nabla) B + B \times (\nabla \times A) + A \times (\nabla \times B)##
Hi thank you for replying!
Sorry, a is a constant vector and r is (X,y,z)

I have not come across this identity. Any hints on how to prove it?
 
Here's a more complete list of identities:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus_identities

Off hand I don't know how to prove this particular identity but often when presented with a problem such as yours you can use the identities transform the left had side to the right hand side or vice versa.to "prove" it.
 
Physgeek64 said:

Homework Statement



prove grad(a.grad(r^-1))= -curl(a cross grad (r^-1))

Homework Equations



curl(a x b)= (b dot grad)a - (a dot grad)b +a(div b) - b(div a )

The Attempt at a Solution


Im trying to use index notation and get
di (aj (grad(r^-1))j)
=grad(r^-1) di(aj) +aj(di grad(r^-1))j

which is obviously not right. I've tried attacking the problem from the reverse direction and haven't had much luck there either.

Thank you :)

Time to learn some latex, I suggest!
 
Some latex codes:

http://web.ift.uib.no/Teori/KURS/WRK/TeX/symALL.html

in particular look at vector operators \nabla for the del operator,\cdot for the inner-product and \times for the cross-product. This site uses mathjax for display. Mathjax looks for expressions bracketted by double # characters.
 
jedishrfu said:
Here's a more complete list of identities:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus_identities

Off hand I don't know how to prove this particular identity but often when presented with a problem such as yours you can use the identities transform the left had side to the right hand side or vice versa.to "prove" it.
I think proving the identity was the purpose of the question? I could be wrong but it's to do with index notation
 
You problem has a specific function ##\nabla(1/r)## in it so its seemed to me that its not an identity but an example where you apply the identity to get the result you need to prove.

Its true I could be wrong here. Perhaps @Mark44 or @PeroK could comment more on this.
 
  • #10
jedishrfu said:
You problem has a specific function ##\nabla(1/r)## in it so its seemed to me that its not an identity but an example where you apply the identity to get the result you need to prove.

Its true I could be wrong here. Perhaps @Mark44 or @PeroK could comment more on this.

I assumed it did depend on the second vector being ##\nabla(1/r)##. It must. I evaluated each side for the x-term (and then used symmetry). It's not too bad if you're careful with your differentiation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #11
PeroK said:
I assumed it did depend on the second vector being ##\nabla(1/r)##. It must. I evaluated each side for the x-term (and then used symmetry). It's not too bad if you're careful with your differentiation.

I checked with the second vector being ##\nabla f## and it reduces to Laplace's equation ##\nabla ^2 f = 0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #12
PeroK said:
I checked with the second vector being ##\nabla f## and it reduces to Laplace's equation ##\nabla ^2 f = 0##
Its okay, I've managed to do it with index notation. Thank you guys for helping though- I really appreciate it :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
13K