Vector equation for a line segment in 3 dimensions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the vector equation for a line segment in three-dimensional space, specifically from the point (2, -1, 4) to (4, 6, 1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different forms of vector equations for the line segment, with one participant expressing dissatisfaction with the book's method and proposing an alternative approach. Questions arise regarding the significance of direction in the vector representation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants examining the validity of various approaches to the problem. There is acknowledgment of the importance of direction in the vector equation, and some participants express satisfaction with the alternative methods discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of differing formats for the vector equation, with some participants questioning the necessity of the book's formula compared to their own interpretations. The original poster's solution is noted to potentially reverse the direction of the line segment.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Find the vector equation for a line segment from (2,-1,4) to (4,6,1).


Homework Equations


Arithmetic :p


The Attempt at a Solution


What I did was that I simply solved for the distance between the two points and used it as my vector, I then said

<4-2t, 6-7t, 1+3t> when 0≤t≤1

The book didn't do anything like this at all. They threw in some weird formula that seems like it complicated everything for no reason at all. Is my way of doing it wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the formula the book threw in ?
Your solution appears to be in the vector form of a line.

Namely:
$$<x_0, y_0, z_0>+t < a, b, c>$$
 
Last edited:
Yeah, well isn't that exactly what they were looking for?
They thew in some (1-t)<vector> + <vector2>. Whatever. I'm not interested in their way as I found a much more intuitive way of doing it on sladder. I was just curious if my answer is OK. It gives the exact same result as their does but it's in a different format.
 
Feodalherren said:
Yeah, well isn't that exactly what they were looking for?
They thew in some (1-t)<vector> + <vector2>. Whatever. I'm not interested in their way as I found a much more intuitive way of doing it on sladder. I was just curious if my answer is OK. It gives the exact same result as their does but it's in a different format.

The segment from ##\vec{a}## to ##\vec{b}## has the form
\vec{v} = \vec{v}(t) \equiv (1-t) \vec{a} + t \vec{b}, \; 0 \leq t \leq 1.
When ##t = 0## we have ##\vec{v} =\vec{a}## and when ##t = 1## we have ##\vec{v} = \vec{b}##.

Note that just saying ##\vec{v} = \vec{a} + t \vec{b}## won't work (why not?).
 
Feodalherren said:

Homework Statement


Find the vector equation for a line segment from (2,-1,4) to (4,6,1).
...

The Attempt at a Solution


What I did was that I simply solved for the distance between the two points and used it as my vector, I then said

<4-2t, 6-7t, 1+3t> when 0≤t≤1

The book didn't do anything like this at all. They threw in some weird formula that seems like it complicated everything for no reason at all. Is my way of doing it wrong?
For one thing your solution goes from (4,6,1) to (2,-1,4) as t goes from 0 to 1 .

... if that makes any difference.
 
SammyS said:
For one thing your solution goes from (4,6,1) to (2,-1,4) as t goes from 0 to 1 .

... if that makes any difference.

Okay, does it matter? It's still the same line, just drawn in a different direction.
 
Feodalherren said:
Okay, does it matter? It's still the same line, just drawn in a different direction.
Tha'ts up to you. You said "Find the vector equation for a line segment from (2,-1,4) to (4,6,1)." Was the "from", "to" important?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I guess it matters then. Didn't really think about that. Thanks.
 
Feodalherren said:
I guess it matters then. Didn't really think about that. Thanks.

Even if direction is important, your initial solution is good if t goes from 1 to 0 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Easy fix! I like it, thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K