Vector fields transverse to the boundary of a manifold

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of vector fields that are transverse to the boundary of a manifold, specifically examining periodic flows on a solid torus. Participants explore definitions and implications of transversality in relation to boundary behavior and periodicity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a periodic flow on a solid torus is transverse to its boundary.
  • Another participant suggests that "transverse" means the flow does not lie in the tangent space to boundary points.
  • A participant argues that since the periodic flow described by the equations $$dx = -y, dy=x \mbox{ and }dz = 0$$ has trajectories parallel to the boundary, it would not be in the tangent space, thus suggesting it is transverse.
  • Another participant agrees with the previous point, affirming the understanding of transversality.
  • One participant emphasizes that a flow being transverse means it cannot be periodic, as periodic flows return points to their original positions after a certain time.
  • A participant elaborates on the nature of periodic flows on a solid torus, indicating that there are multiple periodic flows and clarifying that a flow transverse to the boundary must point either entirely inwards or outwards on that boundary component.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a periodic flow can be transverse to the boundary of a solid torus, with some asserting that it cannot be periodic while others explore specific examples without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining transversality in relation to periodic flows, with participants noting various assumptions and interpretations that may affect the understanding of the topic.

jford1906
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to work up some examples to help me understand this concept. Would the periodic flow on a solid torus be transverse to it's boundary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Transverse I think means here not lying in the tangent space to the boundary points.
 
So since it's a periodic flow, say given by $$dx = -y, dy=x \mbox{ and }dz = 0,$$ all trajectories are parallel to the boundary, so they would not lie in the tangent space to any boundary points, and the flow would be transverse?
 
That sounds right.
 
Rock. Thanks!
 
jford1906 said:
So since it's a periodic flow, say given by $$dx = -y, dy=x \mbox{ and }dz = 0,$$ all trajectories are parallel to the boundary, so they would not lie in the tangent space to any boundary points, and the flow would be transverse?

Transverse to the boundary means that the part of the flow that is on boundary does not lie in the tangent space to the boundary. So the flow must point either outwards or inwards.
 
jford1906 said:
I'm trying to work up some examples to help me understand this concept. Would the periodic flow on a solid torus be transverse to it's boundary?

First of all, there are a lot of different periodic flows on a solid torus, so no one flow is "the" periodic flow.*

Secondly (as Lavinia has said), a flow being transverse to a manifold's boundary means that the flow is never tangent to the boundary. It follows that on each component of the boundary, the flow is either pointing only inwards, or else pointing only outwards on that component. Since the solid torus has only one boundary component, of course, a flow transverse to its boundary must be everywhere outward or everywhere inward on the boundary.

Clearly, any flow transverse to the boundary of any manifold cannot be periodic, since a periodic flow means that at a certain time T > 0, the flow carries all points back to where they started.
_____________________________
* For example: If θ is the angular coordinate in the solid torus D2 × S1 (the disk cross the circle = {exp(iθ) : 0 <= θ < 2π}), then the simplest periodic flow is given by the vector field that is d/dθ everywhere. But now we can imagine cutting D2 × S1 along say the disk D2 × {exp(i0)}, giving one exposed disk a rotation by angle (2πp/q) where p/q is any rational number, and the reattaching the exposed disks to make a solid torus again. In this case, the flow will carry all points back to where they started at time 2πq. The core circle of the solid torus will flow back to where it started in less time, namely 2π, than any other trajectory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K