Vector Math: Squares, Roots, Logarithms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the mathematical operations involving vectors, specifically squaring and taking square roots of vectors, as well as the dimensionality of logarithmic measurements. Squaring a vector, defined as the dot product of the vector with itself, results in a scalar representing the square of the vector's magnitude. The square root of a vector is generally undefined, but under specific definitions, it may yield a vector. Additionally, logarithmic values, such as pKa, are dimensionless, and the logarithm of a measurement retains this property.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, including dot and cross products
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of kinetic energy equations in physics
  • Concept of dimensional analysis in scientific measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector algebra, focusing on dot and cross products
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in various scientific contexts
  • Review kinetic energy equations and their implications in physics
  • Learn about dimensional analysis and its applications in measurement
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students in STEM fields who are interested in vector mathematics, dimensional analysis, and the application of logarithmic functions in scientific measurements.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
If someone takes a vector, and squares it, does it become a scalar?

Also, is it possible to take the square root of a vector, and would the result be a vector or a scalar?

Lastly, the logarithm of a measurement is dimensionless. However, if you raise the base of that logarithm to the power of the logarithm, are the units recovered?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Char. Limit said:
If someone takes a vector, and squares it, does it become a scalar?

How do you square a vector?

Char. Limit said:
Also, is it possible to take the square root of a vector, and would the result be a vector or a scalar?

Probably depends on the definition of squaring a vector, above. Usually I'd say neither is defined, but there are cases where it's useful to define them; in those cases it would depend on the definition. If you define vector multiplication as
v1 * v2 = {[n n], v1 = v2 = [0 0 ... (n zeros) ... 0]
{ apricot, otherwise
for any vectors v1, v2 then sqrt([a b]) = [0 0 ... (a zeros) ... 0 0] if a = b and undefined otherwise.

Char. Limit said:
Lastly, the logarithm of a measurement is dimensionless.

No.
 
Well, I was considering the standard equation for kinetic energy:

E_k=\frac{1}{2}mv^2

Velocity is a vector, and you are squaring it.

Also, if the logarithm of measurement isn't dimensionless, than what is it? Take for example pKa... if not dimensionless, what are its units?
 
Char. Limit said:
Well, I was considering the standard equation for kinetic energy:

E_k=\frac{1}{2}mv^2

Velocity is a vector, and you are squaring it.

Yeah, funny thing that... you're really squaring speed in that equation -- direction plays no part. Don't ask me why it's described as velocity.

Edit: If you interpret squaring as the dot product of a vector with itself, then squaring a vector *does* give a scalar. Of course norming it and squaring gives the same result... at least classically.

Char. Limit said:
Also, if the logarithm of measurement isn't dimensionless, than what is it? Take for example pKa... if not dimensionless, what are its units?

Ka is dimensionless, and so is its logarithm pKa.
 
Last edited:
OK, let me present a different example...

From first-order kinetic rate laws...

ln[A]_t - ln[A]_0 = -kt

What is the unit ln[A]_t, given that the unit for [A]_t is M, or molar?

Also, from what I've heard of kinetic energy, v is described as velocity. I'm also trying to think of another equation where a vector is squared, and all that I'm coming up with is a=\frac{v^2}{r}...
 
When you have vector quantities that get squared in physics, it usually means taking the dot product (scalar product) of the vector with itself. This gives the square of the magnitude of the vector, since it is always parallel with itself and gives a directional cosine of 1. Similarly, a vector (cross) product of a vector with itself always gives zero, so there's no sensible reason for including it in an expression.
 
There are three kinds of products for vectors:

Scalar product, which is a product of vector and scalar doesn't,apply here- you can't take the scalar product of a vector with itself.

You can take take the cross product of a vector with itself but the result is always the 0 vector so \vec{v}\times\vec{v} is not interesting and we don't use \vec{v}^2 to mean that.

That leaves only the dot product. \vec{v}^2= \vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}= |\vec{v}|, a scalar.
 
HallsofIvy said:
That leaves only the dot product. \vec{v}^2= \vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}= |\vec{v}|, a scalar.

\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}=|\vec{v}|^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K