Vector perpendicular to a plane defined by two vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining whether a vector, specifically ##\vec{A} = 3\hat{i} + 4\hat{j} - 4\hat{k}##, is perpendicular to a plane defined by two other vectors. Participants agree that both the dot product and cross product can be utilized for this purpose. The dot product can confirm perpendicularity to each defining vector, while the cross product yields a normal vector to the plane. The final unit vector perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and the derived vector ##\hat{B}## is calculated as ##\hat{C} = \frac{-12 \hat{i} - 16 \hat{j} + 7 \hat{k}}{\sqrt{449}}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, including dot product and cross product.
  • Familiarity with unit vectors and their properties.
  • Knowledge of vector representation in both component form and unit vector notation.
  • Basic algebraic skills for solving simultaneous equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute the cross product of two vectors in three-dimensional space.
  • Study the properties of dot products and their geometric interpretations.
  • Explore the concept of normal vectors in relation to planes defined by vectors.
  • Practice finding unit vectors in various coordinate planes.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who require a solid understanding of vector analysis and its applications in determining geometric relationships in three-dimensional space.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
Say that I have two vectors that define a plane. How do I show that a third vector is perpendicular to this plane? Do I use the cross product somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
What about using the dot product?
I don't see how the dot product would be used... To me, it would make sense to use it when we only need to show that one vector is perpendicular to another. But here we need to show that one vector is perpendicular to a plane (that two other vectors create).
 
A vector perpendicular to the plane would be perpendicular to each of the two vectors that define the plane, so the dot product could be used, taking the dot product of each of the two vectors with the third. Also, the cross product of the two vectors would produce a normal to the plane that would be a scalar multiple of the third vector.

In short, you could use either the dot product or the cross product.
 
Okay, so I am specifically asking this in relation to a specific problem:

Given the vector ##\vec{A} = 3\hat{i} + 4\hat{j} -4\hat{k}##,

(1) find a unit vector ##\hat{B}## that lies in the x-y plane and is perpendicular to \vec{A}.

First, we note that ##\hat{B} = B_x \hat{i} + B_y \hat{j}##, and that ##B_x^2 + B_Y^2 = 1## since ##\hat{B}## is a unit vector. Solving this system simultaneously comes up with the solution ##\displaystyle B_x = \frac{4}{5}, B_y = -\frac{3}{5}##

(2) find a unit vector ##\hat{C}## that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}##.

the unit vector that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}## is ##\displaystyle \hat{C} = \pm \frac{\vec{A} \times \hat{B}}{| \vec{A} \times \hat{B} |}##. After lots of calculations, we find that ##\displaystyle \hat{c} = \frac{-12 \hat{i} - 16 \hat{j} + 7 \hat{k}}{\sqrt{449}}##

(3) show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane defined by ##\hat{B}## and ##\hat{C}##

So would showing that ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{B} = 0## and ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{C} = 0## be sufficient to show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Okay, so I am specifically asking this in relation to a specific problem:

Given the vector ##\vec{A} = 3\hat{i} + 4\hat{j} -4\hat{k}##,

(1) find a unit vector ##\hat{B}## that lies in the x-y plane and is perpendicular to \vec{A}.

First, we note that ##\hat{B} = B_x \hat{i} + B_y \hat{j}##, and that ##B_x^2 + B_Y^2 = 1## since ##\hat{B}## is a unit vector. Solving this system simultaneously comes up with the solution ##\displaystyle B_x = \frac{4}{5}, B_y = -\frac{3}{5}##
Not how I would do it.
1) Find a vector, B, in the x-y plane that is perp. to A.
2) Normalize B to get the unit vector

Since B lies in the x-y plane, it is of the form <x, y, 0>
##A \cdot B = 0 \Rightarrow <3, 4, -4> \cdot <x, y, 0> = 0 \Rightarrow 3x + 4y = 0##
This leads the vectors <3, -4, 0> and <-3, 4, 0>
The corresponding unit vectors are <3/5, -4/5, 0> and <-3/5, 4/5, 0>

Note that I prefer writing vectors using angle brackets rather than with the i, j, and k unit vectors, as being quicker to write.

Mr Davis 97 said:
(2) find a unit vector ##\hat{C}## that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}##.

the unit vector that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}## is ##\displaystyle \hat{C} = \pm \frac{\vec{A} \times \hat{B}}{| \vec{A} \times \hat{B} |}##. After lots of calculations, we find that ##\displaystyle \hat{c} = \frac{-12 \hat{i} - 16 \hat{j} + 7 \hat{k}}{\sqrt{449}}##

(3) show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane defined by ##\hat{B}## and ##\hat{C}##

So would showing that ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{B} = 0## and ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{C} = 0## be sufficient to show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane?
Yes it would, and this is something you should do, because you have a mistake, most likely in your cross product.

Here's a tip. When you do the cross product, don't do it using the unit vector you found earlier. Use either <3, -4, 0> or <-3, 4, 0>. The only difference will be the magnitude of the resulting vector. Since you're going to normalize it anyway, all you need is the right direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K