Mr Davis 97
- 1,461
- 44
Say that I have two vectors that define a plane. How do I show that a third vector is perpendicular to this plane? Do I use the cross product somehow?
This discussion focuses on determining whether a vector, specifically ##\vec{A} = 3\hat{i} + 4\hat{j} - 4\hat{k}##, is perpendicular to a plane defined by two other vectors. Participants agree that both the dot product and cross product can be utilized for this purpose. The dot product can confirm perpendicularity to each defining vector, while the cross product yields a normal vector to the plane. The final unit vector perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and the derived vector ##\hat{B}## is calculated as ##\hat{C} = \frac{-12 \hat{i} - 16 \hat{j} + 7 \hat{k}}{\sqrt{449}}##.
PREREQUISITESStudents and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who require a solid understanding of vector analysis and its applications in determining geometric relationships in three-dimensional space.
I don't see how the dot product would be used... To me, it would make sense to use it when we only need to show that one vector is perpendicular to another. But here we need to show that one vector is perpendicular to a plane (that two other vectors create).jedishrfu said:What about using the dot product?
Not how I would do it.Mr Davis 97 said:Okay, so I am specifically asking this in relation to a specific problem:
Given the vector ##\vec{A} = 3\hat{i} + 4\hat{j} -4\hat{k}##,
(1) find a unit vector ##\hat{B}## that lies in the x-y plane and is perpendicular to \vec{A}.
First, we note that ##\hat{B} = B_x \hat{i} + B_y \hat{j}##, and that ##B_x^2 + B_Y^2 = 1## since ##\hat{B}## is a unit vector. Solving this system simultaneously comes up with the solution ##\displaystyle B_x = \frac{4}{5}, B_y = -\frac{3}{5}##
Yes it would, and this is something you should do, because you have a mistake, most likely in your cross product.Mr Davis 97 said:(2) find a unit vector ##\hat{C}## that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}##.
the unit vector that is perpendicular to both ##\vec{A}## and ##\hat{B}## is ##\displaystyle \hat{C} = \pm \frac{\vec{A} \times \hat{B}}{| \vec{A} \times \hat{B} |}##. After lots of calculations, we find that ##\displaystyle \hat{c} = \frac{-12 \hat{i} - 16 \hat{j} + 7 \hat{k}}{\sqrt{449}}##
(3) show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane defined by ##\hat{B}## and ##\hat{C}##
So would showing that ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{B} = 0## and ##\vec{A} \cdot \hat{C} = 0## be sufficient to show that ##\vec{A}## is perpendicular to the plane?