Vector Surface Integrals: Limits and Unit Vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the vector surface integral of a vector field associated with a square area element centered on the x-axis. The participants are exploring how to determine the limits for the integration over the y and z dimensions, given the square's orientation and dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the limits of integration for the surface integral, questioning whether they should be from (0, w) or (-w/2, w/2). There is also discussion about the role of the unit vector and the nature of the vector field.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the limits for the integration, with some participants suggesting drawing a diagram to visualize the square's placement. Guidance has been offered regarding the parametric form of the square and the implications of its center on the limits.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the square's side length and its center, but there is uncertainty about the specific values and how they influence the limits of integration. The vector field's definition is also under scrutiny, with some confusion about its representation.

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am given a vector field associated with a square area of a certain side, let's call this side dx, centered on the x-axis at a certain point, say x = x1. The sides of this cross sectional square are parallel to the axis of y and z. I have to compute the flux of this vector field, or rather, the vector surface integral.

Now I understand how to set up the equation, substitute the relevant variables, and such. What I'm not totally certain of is how to determine the upper and lower limits over the z and y paths.

Also, what does the unit vector, n, do?

Homework Equations



V n dS, where dS = dydz, and V and n are vectors.

The Attempt at a Solution



As I said, I have already set up the (double) integral according to the above formula, but I need to determine the limits of the definite integral.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they are usually provided. Could you post one question where you think they are not provided?
 
rootX said:
I think they are usually provided. Could you post one question where you think they are not provided?

I am given a vector field that permeates a square area element of a side (of certain value), centered on the x-axis (at a given point on x). The square's sides are parallel to the y and z axes. The unit vector n is equal to the unit vector x, which is equal to the cross product of unit vectors y and z.

That is all I have and I am told to calculate the vector surface integral.

I cannot think of a way to determine the limits. But other than that, the expression is pretty straightforward.
 
Void123 said:
I am given a vector field that permeates a square area element of a side (of certain value), centered on the x-axis (at a given point on x). The square's sides are parallel to the y and z axes. The unit vector n is equal to the unit vector x, which is equal to the cross product of unit vectors y and z.

That is all I have and I am told to calculate the vector surface integral.

I cannot think of a way to determine the limits. But other than that, the expression is pretty straightforward.

Please "post one question where you think they are not provide". Don't just repeat what you said before, post the actual question!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Please "post one question where you think they are not provide". Don't just repeat what you said before, post the actual question!

That is the actual question. Only thing I can add is that the square area has a side of 1, centered on the x-axis at x = 1 (don't know how much this helps). It looks like a flux problem.
 
Void123 said:
I am given a vector field that permeates a square area element of a side (of certain value), centered on the x-axis (at a given point on x). The square's sides are parallel to the y and z axes. The unit vector n is equal to the unit vector x, which is equal to the cross product of unit vectors y and z.

That is all I have and I am told to calculate the vector surface integral.

I cannot think of a way to determine the limits. But other than that, the expression is pretty straightforward.

If you are "given" a square, you must have been given the length of one of its sides, call it w. If you know at it as some point on the x-axis, say x = a, then you know the square must have the parametric form < a, x, y > where x and y vary over the square. Now you just have to use what you are given by the placement of the square. Does x go from 0 to w or from -w/2 to w/2 or what? Ditto for y. Draw a picture.

You haven't given us the vector field. If the vector field is constant it might not matter where the square is located, but usually it would matter.
 
The vector field is V = xyz (in the xth direction).

If the side of the square is 1 and its centered around the x-axis with the sides parallel to the y and z axes, then wouldn't the limits be (0, 1/2) for y and z, respectively?
 
Last edited:
Void123 said:
The vector field is V = xyz (in the xth direction).

If the side of the square is 1 and its centered around the x-axis with the sides parallel to the y and z axes, then wouldn't the limits be (0, 1/2) for y and z, respectively?

I collected that
1) <1,0,0> is the normal
2) surface area is a square with length of 1 and center of x0
3) the vector field is V = xyz

Draw a square with center at x0, so are the limits for y and z from -1/2 to 1/2 or 0 to 1/2?

P.S. you should provide all the information in one post. Please note that other people cannot read your mind.
 
rootX said:
I collected that
1) <1,0,0> is the normal
2) surface area is a square with length of 1 and center of x0
3) the vector field is V = xyz

Draw a square with center at x0, so are the limits for y and z from -1/2 to 1/2 or 0 to 1/2?

P.S. you should provide all the information in one post. Please note that other people cannot read your mind.

I am not sure about the limits. I am trying to think of any information that would be indicative of what the limits should be.

Also, I apologize if I have not been clear.
 
  • #10
rootX said:
I collected that
1) <1,0,0> is the normal
2) surface area is a square with length of 1 and center of x0
3) the vector field is V = xyz

Draw a square with center at x0, so are the limits for y and z from -1/2 to 1/2 or 0 to 1/2?

P.S. you should provide all the information in one post. Please note that other people cannot read your mind.

With regard to 1) ..so dS = <1, 0, 0> dy dz, right?

With regard to 2) The [bold]surface[\bold] is a square. Its area is a number. And when you say "center at x0" do you mean (x0, 0, 0)?

With regard to 3) V = xyz is not a vector field; it is an ordinary scalar function.
I guess you mean V = <xyz, 0 , 0 >

As for whether the limits on y and z are -1/2 to 1/2 or 0 to 1/2, which choice would describe a square of side 1 centered at (x0, 0, 0)?

In my reply I said:

Kurtz said:
If you are "given" a square, you must have been given the length of one of its sides, call it w. If you know at it as some point on the x-axis, say x = a, then you know the square must have the parametric form < a, x, y > where x and y vary over the square. Now you just have to use what you are given by the placement of the square. Does x go from 0 to w or from -w/2 to w/2 or what? Ditto for y. Draw a picture.[/qoute]

I have a typo there; the parametric from of the square would be <a, y, z> where y and z vary over the range discussed above.

Do you have enough to solve it now?
 
  • #11
Everything you have stated sounds legitimate to me. The only confusion I have is deciding between (0,w) or (-w/2, w/2). I am sure I am missing something very trivial here which ought to resolve this.
 
  • #12
Void123 said:
Everything you have stated sounds legitimate to me. The only confusion I have is deciding between (0,w) or (-w/2, w/2). I am sure I am missing something very trivial here which ought to resolve this.

If your square is centered at (x0, 0, 0) and is parallel to the yz plane, as far as the yz plane is concerned, it is centered at (0,0). Draw a picture of a square centered at (0,0) whose sides have length w. That should answer your question.
 
  • #13
LCKurtz said:
If your square is centered at (x0, 0, 0) and is parallel to the yz plane, as far as the yz plane is concerned, it is centered at (0,0). Draw a picture of a square centered at (0,0) whose sides have length w. That should answer your question.

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K