# Vectors in R4 othogonal to other vectors.

• kiwicounter
In summary: These equations are equivalent to the ones you started with. The first equation gives you c = (-2/3)a - (1/3)d. Substituting this expression for c into the second equation gives you the equation (-2/3)a - (1/3)d - (1/4)d = 0, which simplifies to d = -4a. So the solutions to the original system are all vectors of the form <a, b, (-2/3)a - (1/3)d, -4a>, where a and d are arbitrary
kiwicounter
1. Find all vecors in R4 orthogonal to both of the vectors (1,2,1,0) and (2,0,3,1)

a + 2b + c = 0
2a + c + d = 0
d = 4b + c
c = -a -2b

## The Attempt at a Solution

a = 1 b = 0

(1,0,-1,3)

a=0 b = 1

(0,1,-2,-2)

I'm struggling with this stuff, I got this method here, but cannot find the original thread since joining. Thanks for your time.

kiwicounter said:
1. Find all vecors in R4 orthogonal to both of the vectors (1,2,1,0) and (2,0,3,1)

## Homework Equations

a + 2b + c = 0
2a + c + d = 0
d = 4b + c
c = -a -2b
The first two equations are the system you need to solve.

I can see where you got the 4th equation, but it's not obvious to me where the 3rd equation came from

Since you have a system of two equations in four unknowns, there are going to be two free variables, meaning that there will be an infinite number of solutions.
kiwicounter said:

## The Attempt at a Solution

a = 1 b = 0

(1,0,-1,3)

a=0 b = 1

(0,1,-2,-2)

Are you saying here that there are just two solutions to the system?

You can check your work, by dotting the vectors you got with the given vectors. <1, 0, -1, 3> works, since it is orthogonal to both of the given vectors, but <0, 1, -2, -2> isn't orthogonal to either of the given vectors.
kiwicounter said:
I'm struggling with this stuff, I got this method here, but cannot find the original thread since joining. Thanks for your time.

Thank you. I don't know how to write out the answer for infinite answers.

I got d = 4b + c by substituting c = -a - 2b into the equation a + 2b + c = 0 giving a + 2b +(-a - 2b) = 0, simplifying to 0 = 0 DOH! Mistake.

If I put c = -a -2b into the other equation 2a + c + d = 0...

2a + (-a -2b) +d = 0, simplifies to a - 2b + d = 0 rearranged to d = 2b - a. If this is correct...

I have equations

a + 2b + c = 0
2a + c + d = 0
c = -a -2b
d = 2b-a

a= 1 b = 0

(1,0,-1,-1)

a = 0 b = 1

(0,1,-2,2)

None of my answers are actually orthogonal to both vectors.

I'm lost. I can do a cross product in 3-space but don't know what to do in n-space. Nor do I know how to present an answer that has infinite solutions. I'll persevere, but I am a bit lost. Perhaps sleeping on it will help it's been a long days math for me.

I missed this before, but one of your first two equations has an error. They should be
a + 2b + c = 0
2a + 3c + d = 0

These equations come from the dot product of your unknown vector <a, b, c, d> with each of your given vectors <1, 2, 1, 0> and <2, 0, 3, 1>.

Do you know how to work with systems in matrix form? The system above can be represented as this 2 x 4 matrix:
[1 2 1 0]
[2 0 3 1]

You can solve the system of equations by row reducing this matrix. If you haven't learned this technique yet, you'll need to work directly with the equations.

Regarding the cross product, it doesn't apply in this problem. The cross product is applicable only to vectors in three-dimensional space.

Thanks Mark I really appreciate your help and time here. I'm an ecology major and math is my achilles heel. I'm going to plant a Kauri (giant forest tree) and name it after you to remind me always of the kindness of strangers.

Wow, a mistake right at the start huh. That wouldn't help. I was tired and confused...

If I reduced these in matrix form and solved, would I have an answer resembling 'all vectors in R4 orthogonal to the two vectors given.'

1210
2031 => R2 - 2R1

1 2 1 0
0-4 1 1 => R2 x -1/4 (can I do this?)

1 2 1 0 => R1 - 2R2
0 1 -1/4 -1/4

1 0 1.5 1/2
0 1 -1/4 -1/4

I'm just making a mess I don't know where I'm meant to be going with this sorry.

Try equations. I think what I'm meant to do here is get equations for c and d that do not include c's and d's in those equations - so when arbitrary values are given for a and b, d and c are solvable?

I got c = -a -2b from the first equation then substituted this into the second equation and simplified then rearranged to get the equation d = 2a + 6b for d.

a + 2b + c = 0
a + 3c + d = 0
c = -a - 2b
d = 2a + 6b

a=0 b=1

(0,1,-2,6) This is orthoganal to both.

a=1 b=0

(1,0,-1,2) This didn't work. Only orthogonal to the first vector. I've double checked the original question and it is correct.

So I found one. How do I find 'all of them' without spending an eternity (infinite solutions).

kiwicounter said:
Thanks Mark I really appreciate your help and time here. I'm an ecology major and math is my achilles heel. I'm going to plant a Kauri (giant forest tree) and name it after you to remind me always of the kindness of strangers.

Wow, a mistake right at the start huh. That wouldn't help. I was tired and confused...

If I reduced these in matrix form and solved, would I have an answer resembling 'all vectors in R4 orthogonal to the two vectors given.'

1210
2031 => R2 - 2R1

1 2 1 0
0-4 1 1 => R2 x -1/4 (can I do this?)

1 2 1 0 => R1 - 2R2
0 1 -1/4 -1/4

1 0 1.5 1/2
0 1 -1/4 -1/4
This is exactly right.

Now, let's translate this matrix back into a system of equations involving a, b, c, and d.
a + (3/2)c + (1/2)d = 0
b - (1/4)c - (1/4)d = 0

This also says that
a = -(3/2)c - (1/2)d
b = (1/4)c + (1/4)d
c = c
d = ......d

The last two equations are obviously true.
You can pretty much read off two vectors from the righthand side. You solution is all linear combinations of those two vectors.

In four dimensions, the solution set is a plane.
kiwicounter said:
I'm just making a mess I don't know where I'm meant to be going with this sorry.

Try equations. I think what I'm meant to do here is get equations for c and d that do not include c's and d's in those equations - so when arbitrary values are given for a and b, d and c are solvable?

I got c = -a -2b from the first equation then substituted this into the second equation and simplified then rearranged to get the equation d = 2a + 6b for d.

a + 2b + c = 0
a + 3c + d = 0
c = -a - 2b
d = 2a + 6b

a=0 b=1

(0,1,-2,6) This is orthoganal to both.

a=1 b=0

(1,0,-1,2) This didn't work. Only orthogonal to the first vector. I've double checked the original question and it is correct.

So I found one. How do I find 'all of them' without spending an eternity (infinite solutions).

## 1. What is a vector in R4?

A vector in R4 is a mathematical object that has four components or coordinates. It can be represented as (x, y, z, w) and is often used to describe physical quantities such as velocity, force, or displacement in four-dimensional space.

## 2. How do you determine if two vectors in R4 are orthogonal?

To determine if two vectors in R4 are orthogonal, you need to take the dot product of the two vectors. If the dot product is equal to zero, then the vectors are orthogonal. This means that the two vectors are perpendicular to each other and form a 90-degree angle.

## 3. Can a vector in R4 be orthogonal to more than one vector?

Yes, a vector in R4 can be orthogonal to more than one vector. This is because there are an infinite number of vectors in R4, and any two non-parallel vectors can be orthogonal to each other.

## 4. How do you find a vector in R4 that is orthogonal to a given set of vectors?

To find a vector in R4 that is orthogonal to a given set of vectors, you can use the Gram-Schmidt process. This involves finding an orthogonal basis for the given set of vectors and then using this basis to find the orthogonal vector in R4.

## 5. Why are orthogonal vectors important in mathematics and science?

Orthogonal vectors are important in mathematics and science because they allow us to simplify complex problems and calculations. They are also used in many applications, such as 3D graphics, physics, and engineering, to represent and manipulate physical quantities in a concise and efficient manner.

• Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
936
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
3K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
535
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
• Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
722
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K