MHB How Do You Express Vectors in a Rectangle Using Midpoint Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rectangle Vectors
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants explore expressing vectors in a rectangle, specifically using midpoint coordinates. For vector \(\overrightarrow{CD}\), it is derived as \(\overrightarrow{OD} - \overrightarrow{OC}\). The vector \(\overrightarrow{OA}\) is expressed as half of \(\overrightarrow{CD}\), resulting in \(\frac{1}{2}(\overrightarrow{OD} - \overrightarrow{OC})\). Lastly, \(\overrightarrow{AD}\) is calculated to be \(\frac{1}{2}(\overrightarrow{OD} + \overrightarrow{OC})\). The discussion emphasizes the relationships between these vectors in the context of the rectangle's geometry.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 1019$$ABCD$$ is a rectangle and $$O$$ is the midpoint of $$[AB]$$.

Express each of the following vectors in terms of $$\overrightarrow{OC}$$ and $$\overrightarrow{OD}$$
(a) $$\overrightarrow{CD} $$

ok I am fairly new to vectors and know this is a simple problem but still need some input
on (a) I thot this would be a vector difference but this would make $$\overrightarrow{CD} = 0$$

(b) $$\overrightarrow{OA}$$
(c) $$\overrightarrow{AD}$$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: vectors inside a rectangle

Hello, karush!

View attachment 1019

$$ABCD$$ is a rectangle and $$O$$ is the midpoint of $$[AB]$$.

Express each of the following vectors in terms of $$\overrightarrow{OC}$$ and $$\overrightarrow{OD}$$

(a) $$\overrightarrow{CD} $$
\overrightarrow{CD} \;=\;\overrightarrow{CO} + \overrightarrow{OD} \;=\;-\overrightarrow{OC} + \overrightarrow{OD} \;=\;\overrightarrow{OD} - \overrightarrow{OC}
(b) $$\overrightarrow{OA}$$
\overrightarrow{OA} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{CD} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{2}\left(\overrightarrow{OD} - \overrightarrow{OC}\right)
(c) $$\overrightarrow{AD}$$
\overrightarrow{AD} \;=\;\overrightarrow{AO} + \overrightarrow{OD} \;=\;-\overrightarrow{OA} + \overrightarrow{OD} \;=\;\overrightarrow{OD} - \overrightarrow{OA}

. . . .=\;\overrightarrow{OD} - \tfrac{1}{2}\left(\overrightarrow{OD} - \overrightarrow{OC}\right) \;=\;\overrightarrow{OD} - \tfrac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{OD} + \tfrac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{OC}

. . . .=\;\tfrac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{OD} + \tfrac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{OC} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{2}\left(\overrightarrow{OD} + \overrightarrow{OC}\right)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top