Vectors: Linear Combinations and Parallelism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around vectors, specifically focusing on linear combinations and parallelism. The original poster presents a problem involving finding scalars for given vector conditions, including parallel vectors and linear combinations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine conditions for parallel vectors and linear combinations, questioning the validity of their assumptions and the implications of scalar multiples. Some participants suggest substituting variables to explore relationships between the scalars.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various approaches to the equations presented. There is recognition of the complexity involved, particularly with the number of unknowns versus equations, and some guidance has been offered regarding substitution and elimination methods.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the validity of their reasoning and the potential for multiple solutions, particularly in the context of the second and third parts of the problem. There is also mention of imposed homework rules that may affect the approach to solving the problems.

JP16
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question states: "find all scalars c, if any exist such that given statement is true."
It also suggests trying to do without pencil and paper.

a) vector [c2, c3, c4] is parallel to [1,-2,4] with same direction.

b) vector [13, -15] is a linear combination of vectors [1,5] and [3,c]

c) vector [-1,c] is a linear combination of vectors [-3,5] and [6,-11]

The Attempt at a Solution



a) for it to be parallel, it has to be a scalar multiple of [1,-2,4] = x. and [c2, c3, c4] = y. then you can say ax = y. but wouldn't that give different values for all 3 c's? Let's say for example a=2. then 2x = y. then it would be:
i) c2 = 2*1
ii) c3 = 2*-2
iii) c4 = 2*4
which results in a different value of c in each. can i conclude that there DNE a such c?

b) the scalar multiple could be any real number for both vectors so c could be any real number?

c) 1[-3,5] + 1/3[6,-11] = [-1,4/3] so c = 4/3. this was achieved by trial and error. firstly is this even right? second, if its right, is there a algebraic way of doing it. it would have 3 unknowns and 2 equations.

at a glance seems pretty simple, or i just forgot some of the things i learned last year. any guidance would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve any of these systematically you need to solve equations. Take the first one. You've got ax=y. So you've got c^2=a*1, c^3=a*(-2), and c^4=a*4. Just showing that a=2 doesn't work doesn't mean NO number can work. You would need to show that. Hint: the first equation tells you a=c^2. Substitute that for 'a' in the other equations. I wouldn't try to do these without pencil and paper until you know how to do them with pencil and paper.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
To solve any of these systematically you need to solve equations. Take the first one. You've got ax=y. So you've got c^2=a*1, c^3=a*(-2), and c^4=a*4. Just showing that a=2 doesn't work doesn't mean NO number can work. You need to show that. Hint: the first equation tells you a=c^2. Substitute that for 'a' in the other equations. I wouldn't try to do these without pencil and paper until you know how to do them with pencil and paper.

oh i tried doing that with 2x=y, now i see why that would be wrong.
c3 = -2c2
c = -2 => not valid since c has to be > 0, since its in the 'same direction'. moving on.

c4= 4c2
c = 2 => which holds true so then a = 4.

I know you need to solve equations, but for questions such as b and c, i get one more unknown then the number of equation. For b, wouldn't more than one value of c hold true, intuitively? in fact all real values?

and for c i get :
-3x + 6y = -1
5x - 11y = c
2 equations with 3 unknowns! how do i go about solving that?
 
JP16 said:
oh i tried doing that with 2x=y, now i see why that would be wrong.
c3 = -2c2
c = -2 => not valid since c has to be > 0, since its in the 'same direction'. moving on.

c4= 4c2
c = 2 => which holds true so then a = 4.

I know you need to solve equations, but for questions such as b and c, i get one more unknown then the number of equation. For b, wouldn't more than one value of c hold true, intuitively? in fact all real values?

and for c i get :
-3x + 6y = -1
5x - 11y = c
2 equations with 3 unknowns! how do i go about solving that?

For the first one, c=(-2) does work. The thing that's supposed to be positive is a, not c. What is a if c=(-2)??

For the other two, sure you have more unknowns than equations. So you likely have an infinite number of solutions. But work it out. Eliminate one of the variables that's not c and look at the remaining equation. For b) you'll find a value of c that does NOT work.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
6K