Velocity/Acceleration relation w/ constants

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between velocity and acceleration for a particle, described by the equation v² = w²(A² - x²), where w and A are constants. Participants are exploring how to derive the expression for acceleration from this relationship.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for differentiating the given equation, including the use of chain rule and direct differentiation with respect to time or position. There is uncertainty about the correct application of these methods.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning each other's approaches and clarifying notation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation process, but no consensus on the method has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the variables and notation used in the equations, particularly concerning the differentiation with respect to time versus position. Participants are also navigating the implications of constants in their calculations.

snovak216
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The velocity of a particle is related to its position by: v2 = w2 (A2 - x2) where w and A are constants. Show that the acceleration is given by: a=-w2x[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



a= v* dv/dt

v=(A2w2-x2w2)1/2

dv/dt= 1/2 (A2w2-x2w2)-1/2 * -2xw2

v * dv/dt = 1/2*-2xw2 * (A2w2-x2w2)1/2/ (A2w2-x2w2)-1/2

-w2x

I think this is the proper way of showing the acceleration, but I'm not 100% with my chain rule and cancellations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snovak216 said:
a= v* dv/dt
I think not.
 
haruspex said:
I think not.

Sorry, I looked at v* dv/dx. Now definitely not sure how to go about it.
 
snovak216 said:
Sorry, I looked at v* dv/dx. Now definitely not sure how to go about it.
What do you get if you simply differentiate the given equation wrt time?
 
haruspex said:
What do you get if you simply differentiate the given equation wrt time?

Wouldn't we have to differentiate wrt x? As t doesn't appear in the equation.
 
snovak216 said:
Wouldn't we have to differentiate wrt x? As t doesn't appear in the equation.
Either will work, but you're right that differentiating wrt x is quicker here - so do it.
 
After eliminating the ^2,

v= w * √(a^2 - x^2)

dv/dx= -xw/ √(a^2-x^2)
 
snovak216 said:
After eliminating the ^2,
No need - just differentiate as is.
 
I think I understand the derivation, but I do not understand the notation for v^2 and a

v^2*dv/dx
2v/dx? = 2w(a^2-x^2)+ w^2(2a -2x)

but since 2w and 2a are constants,

so 2v/dx?= w^2*-2x

dividing by 2

v/dx= -xw^2

and, however notation allows, the v/dx? is equivalent to a.

therefore a= -xw^2
 
  • #10
snovak216 said:
v^2*dv/dx
No, you want ##\frac d{dx} v^2##. Apply the chain rule.
 
  • #11
2v * dv/dx= 0*(a^2-x^2)+ w^2*(0 -2x)= w^2*-2x

2v dv/dx = -2x*w^2

v dv/dx = -x*w^2

where
v dv/dx= a?
 
  • #12
snovak216 said:
2v * dv/dx= 0*(a^2-x^2)+ w^2*(0 -2x)= w^2*-2x

2v dv/dx = -2x*w^2

v dv/dx = -x*w^2

where
v dv/dx= a?
Yes.
 
  • #13
I appreciate the help, it's nice to be walked through the proper notation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K