Velocity, barrel length and bore volume

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
kalkyl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.

How does a bullet propell inside a bore? What determine its velocity? I read that a bullet in cal .44 propelled by black powder from a 3” barrel is as powerful as a .25 ACP, however with a longer barrel, the velocity increase significant. With a 8” barrel a .44 black powder bullet is as powerful as a modern 9mm.

The reason that handguns today has shorter barrels compared to the black powder guns of the old days, is because the smokeless powder burn faster. Simply put, black powder burn to slow to create high enough velocity inside a short barrel.

However, is it really a matter of the length of the barrel or in fact a matter of the volume? Let suppose that a .57 barrel that’s 3” long has the same bore volume as a .44 barrel that’s 8” long. With equal volume, the black powder should be able to burn to the same extent, or? Will the .57 bullet in the 3” barrel have the same velocity as the .44 bullet in the 8” barrel provided that the same charge of black powder is used and that the bullets has the same weight?

If we take into account that the .57 ball will weigh more than the .44 ball, how does that change the ballistics and the energy outcome?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kalkyl said:
How does a bullet propell inside a bore? What determine its velocity?

There are many factors, including bullet mass, chamber pressure, barrel length, and more.

kalkyl said:
However, is it really a matter of the length of the barrel or in fact a matter of the volume? Let suppose that a .57 barrel that’s 3” long has the same bore volume as a .44 barrel that’s 8” long. With equal volume, the black powder should be able to burn to the same extent, or? Will the .57 bullet in the 3” barrel have the same velocity as the .44 bullet in the 8” barrel provided that the same charge of black powder is used and that the bullets has the same weight?

It's not really about the volume, it's about having enough barrel length for the black powder to burn more completely before the bullet leaves the barrel. In other words, you need more time, not volume. An 'ideal' scenario might involve some sort of mechanism that prevents the bullet from accelerating until the pressure in the chamber reaches a certain point. That way you can reach a higher chamber/barrel pressure which will accelerate the bullet faster and require a shorter barrel for equal velocities. But since real firearms don't have such a mechanisms, we have to use a longer barrel instead.
 
There is more than that, too much to cover here. Cartridge case shape, bullet weight, powder burn rate, and more are all important.

Search terms interior ballistics will get you a lot of good information. The same search terms in Amazon brings up several books on the subject.
 
It’s a complex subject for sure. Let’s keep it as basic as possible and hold on to black powder. I thought that more volume gave more time for the powder to burn? If we have a 3” barrel in .44 and gradually increase the size of the caliber (and the weight of the bullet too, let’s assume that we use roundballs), to a certain point the bullet shot from the 3” barrel will be big enough to generate an equal amount of ft/lbs as the .44 ball shot from the 8” barrel - is that correct? With other words, a bigger caliber will compensate a shorter barrel?

If so, is it more a matter of heavier ball/more mass than increased volume of the bore?
 
kalkyl said:
I thought that more volume gave more time for the powder to burn?

In this case, yes, because a longer barrel has a larger volume, so it just happens to come out that way. Think about what happens if you increase the chamber volume instead. You'll actually have reduced pressure because the larger volume takes more gas (from the vaporized powder) to get to the same pressure.

kalkyl said:
If we have a 3” barrel in .44 and gradually increase the size of the caliber (and the weight of the bullet too, let’s assume that we use roundballs), to a certain point the bullet shot from the 3” barrel will be big enough to generate an equal amount of ft/lbs as the .44 ball shot from the 8” barrel - is that correct? With other words, a bigger caliber will compensate a shorter barrel?

It will as long as you also increase the amount of powder as you increase the caliber. So it's not really a fair comparison since you aren't use the same amount of powder in both cases.