MHB Velocity & Horizontal Distance of Person on Water Slide

chunky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
a person slides down a water slide that is 61 m long and has a slope angle of 24 degrees and the end is a ramp with a height of 3.66 m with an angle of 30 degrees to the horizontal determine the magnitude and direction of the velocity of the person when they just fly away from the ramp and the horizontal distance that they fly.

View attachment 2500
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are a number of equations that I like to say "have physics in them", as opposed to being merely descriptive. Your equations with physics, in a typical order of presentation, are the following:
  1. Newton's Second Law
  2. Conservation of Energy
  3. Work-Energy Theorem
  4. Conservation of Linear Momentum
  5. Conservation of Angular Momentum

Which of these approaches do you think would be appropriate for this problem?
 
I believe the most appropriate approach would be the conservation of energy ie,

T1+V1+U1-2=T2+V2

Then just find all of the relevant pieces of information from the question and subbing them into the equation and solving for the magnitude and direction of the velocity and well as the max flying distance
 
I would agree that CoE would be the right approach for the first part of this problem (finding the velocity). Once you do that, however, how would you continue?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top