Velocity of a football with and without drag

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a football projected vertically under two conditions: without air drag and with linear and quadratic air drag. The equations of motion are derived using Newton's second law, F=ma, and the drag forces are represented as linear (c1v) and quadratic (c2v^2). Participants provided insights on isolating variables and integrating the resulting equations, highlighting the complexity of the integrals involved in parts 2 and 3 of the homework assignment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of linear and quadratic drag forces
  • Ability to manipulate differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integration techniques such as u-substitution and partial fraction decomposition
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Investigate advanced topics in fluid dynamics related to drag forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators looking for insights into teaching complex integration problems in a physics context.

N8G
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A professional thrower projects a football straight up in the air.
1. Assuming there is no air drag on the football, find the speed of the football as a function of height as the ball goes up.
2. Assuming the air drag on the football varies linearly with speed, find the speed of the football as a function of height as the ball goes up.
3. Assuming the air drag on the football varies quadratically with speed, find the speed of the football as a function of height as the ball goes up.

Homework Equations


F=ma which extends to mv dv/dx through chain rule
linear drag = c1v
quadratic drag = c2v^2

In each case the sum of the forces in the y direction equals mg minus the corresponding drag term

The Attempt at a Solution


1. mg = mv dv/dx ... separate variables, v(y) = root( 2gy +vo^2)
2. mg - c1v = mv dv/dx ... unsure how to isolate variables, haven't made it to part 3 but same issue

I'm hoping that I'm missing something simple that I've just overlooked, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you confusing x and y, or using them for the same thing?
If up is the positive x (or y) direction, the gravitational force is -mg, not mg.
 
N8G said:
mg - c1v = mv dv/dx ... unsure how to isolate variables
Try a bit harder... it really is very simple. You just want all the references to x on one side and all the references to v on the other.
And as mjc123 mentions, you should check your signs. Or maybe you are taking g to have a negative value (which is a valid approach).
 
My bad, any x's should be y's.

For the second part of the problem I have:
mvdv/dy = mg - cv which I reduce to
dv/dy = g/v - c/m
From here I don't see a way to isolate the v term on the rhs from the dy when separating my variables.

And I am taking g to be -9.8m/s^2
 
Never mind. I think I lost my mind and forgot about how division works.

I should be able to just say:

mg - cv = mv dv/dy

1 = mv/(mg-cv) dv/dy

dy = mv/(mg-cv) dv

Sorry for that.
 
N8G said:
Never mind. I think I lost my mind and forgot about how division works.

I should be able to just say:

mg - cv = mv dv/dy

1 = mv/(mg-cv) dv/dy

dy = mv/(mg-cv) dv

Sorry for that.
Glad to see you found your mind.
 
That being said, I figured out how to separate the variables but the integrals for part 2 and 3 both turned out to be horrendous given that I’m looking for the velocity wrt height functions. Each integral needed either aggressive attempts at u substitution or partial fraction decomposition followed by an annoying transform. I find it hard to believe thay professor intended that much work for a minute 10 pt homework assignment. Am I missing something elementary that would make my life easier?
 
N8G said:
the integrals for part 2 and 3 both turned out to be horrendous
They shouldn't. What do you get?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K