Velocity of Timelike Curve in Special Relativity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the concept of timelike curves in special relativity, particularly the parametrization of these curves using proper time and the properties of the 4-velocity associated with them. Participants explore the mathematical definitions and implications of these concepts within the framework of spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the metric and proper time in the context of timelike curves and questions how parametrization by proper time is defined.
  • Another participant confirms the understanding of the first question and provides a calculation involving the chain rule to demonstrate the unit length of the 4-velocity.
  • A third participant suggests an alternative method to derive the unit length of the 4-velocity, using a stationary observer and discussing the invariance of the 4-vector's magnitude under Lorentz transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical framework and the properties of the 4-velocity, but the discussion includes varying approaches to understanding and deriving these properties, indicating that multiple perspectives are present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion relies on specific definitions and assumptions regarding proper time and the metric of spacetime, which may not be universally accepted or fully explored by all participants.

JonnyG
Messages
233
Reaction score
45
In special relativity we can view spacetime as ##\mathbb{R}^4## with its standard smooth structure, and a metric ##\eta_{ab} = \sum\limits_{\mu, \nu = 0}^3 \eta_{\mu, \nu} (dx^\mu)_a (dx^\nu)_b## where ##\nu_{\mu \nu} = \mathrm{diag}(-1, 1, 1, )##. Given a curve ##\gamma: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^4## (where ##I## is an interval), let ##T## be the tangent vector field on ##\gamma##. Then we define the proper time as ##\tau = \int (-\eta_{ab}T^aT^b)^{1/2} dt##, where ##t## parametrizes ##\gamma##. We define timelike curves as curves whose proper time is negative. Now, Wald says that "we may parametrize timelike curves by the proper time ##\tau##". How are we parametrizing the curve using ##\tau##? Are we parametrizing it in the sense that, for each given ##t##, some portion of the curve is traced out, and its proper time (its length, in a sense) is given by ##\tau##? I believe this is what he must mean, but please correct me if I am wrong.

But onto the main reason for my post: In the same notation as above, given a timelike curve parametrized by ##\tau##, the tangent vector ##u^a## is defined as the ##4-##velocity of the curve. Wald says that it follows directly from the definition of ##\tau## that the ##4-##velocity has unit length: ##\eta(u, u) = -1##. I don't see how this is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes to your first question.

As to your second question, the key is the chain rule. For typing ease, I'll use X to mean all for coordinates parametrized by t. Then:

dX/dτ = dX/dt * dt/dτ = (dX/dt) / (dτ /dt)

Compute this using your definition of tau, and the definition of the tangent vector. It will fall right out (take the norm of your result).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JonnyG
Thanks! It was a straight forward calculation.
 
Her'es another way of getting the same result. Suppose you have a stationary observer. We compute the 4-velocity u. ##u^0 = dx^0/d\tau=1##, and ##u^i = dx^i/d\tau=0## for i = 1,2,3.

If we compute the length of the 4-vector above, we get -1, from the basic definition.

Now we do a general Lorentz boost of the 4-velocity, so the point is no longer stationary in the new coordinates. But the length of the 4-vector is invariant, so the magnitude of u is still -1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JonnyG

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
600
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K