I Velocity transformation between frames rotating relative to one another

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how velocities transform between two frames that are rotating relative to each other. The transformation law for a particle's velocity in an inertial frame transitioning to a rotating frame is expressed as v = v' + ω × r', where ω is the angular frequency. When moving to a second rotating frame, the velocity transformation can be expressed similarly, leading to v = v'' + Ω_tot × r'', with Ω_tot being the combined angular velocities. The participant questions whether the relative velocity of the particle to the first rotating frame remains invariant when transformed to the second frame and how the cross-product term would change. The analogy of teacup rides is used to illustrate the concept of successive rotations sharing the same direction of angular velocities.
TOAsh2004
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
How does the velocity transform under two successive rotations? Is the velocity relative to one rotating frame invariant under a second rotating around the same origin?
Good evening,

I was wondering about how velocities transform when two successive rotations are applied. In other words, how is the transformation law between two frames which are rotating relative to another.
Lets say some particle is moving with a velocity v in an inertial frame S. If we go from this inertial frame to one rotating with an angular frequency ω around the origin, the velocity v in the non rotating system is related to the velocity ##\vec v^{'}## in the rotating frame by ##S^{'}## by $$\vec v = \vec v^{'}+\vec ω \times \vec r^{'} \qquad (1)$$ Now, we move to another frame ##S^{''}## which is rotating relative to ##S^{'}## around the same origin with an angular velocity Ω. My question is now: How does the expression for v above look in this frame. I know that for the velocities one can derive the expression (1) by writing the position vector in each of the bases and then compare the total time derivatives. Consequently, the velocities should be related by the same equation as above, like $$\vec v^{'} = \vec v^{''}+\vec Ω \times \vec r^{''}$$ But I am not sure though. Is it right to just express the crossproduct in (1) in the new frame like $$ D \vec ω \times \vec r^{'}= \vec ω^{''} \times \vec r^{''} $$ with D being the rotation matrix between ##S^{'}## and ##S^{''}##? One would then arrive at $$\vec v = \vec v^{''}+\vec Ω_{tot} \times \vec r^{''} $$ with ##\vec Ω_{tot}=\vec Ω+\vec ω^{''}##
Further, I'd like to ask about the relative velocity of the particle to the rotating frame ##S^{'}##. Is this something like $$\vec v_{S,S^{'}} = \vec v-\vec ω \times \vec r^{'} \qquad (2)$$ And if we transform this quantity into the rotating frame ##S^{''}##, does it stay invariant? Like the analogue case of linear relative velocities that stay invariant under linear velocity transformations. How would the crossproduct term transform here? Thanks in advance for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
May I imagine that teacup rides belongs to your successive rotations with sharing direction of omegas ?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top