Velocity transformation between frames rotating relative to one another

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the transformation of velocities between two rotating frames, specifically frames S' and S'' that rotate relative to each other with angular velocities ω and Ω, respectively. The transformation law is established as $$\vec v = \vec v^{''} + \vec Ω_{tot} \times \vec r^{''}$$, where $$\vec Ω_{tot} = \vec Ω + \vec ω^{''}$$. The participant seeks clarification on whether the relative velocity of a particle in frame S' remains invariant when transformed to frame S'', particularly regarding the cross product term. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical relationships governing these transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and angular velocity
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly cross products
  • Knowledge of inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Basic principles of kinematics in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity transformations in rotating frames
  • Explore the implications of angular velocity in non-inertial frames
  • Learn about rotation matrices and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the invariance of relative velocities under different transformations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and students studying rotational dynamics and kinematics, particularly those interested in the behavior of particles in rotating reference frames.

TOAsh2004
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
How does the velocity transform under two successive rotations? Is the velocity relative to one rotating frame invariant under a second rotating around the same origin?
Good evening,

I was wondering about how velocities transform when two successive rotations are applied. In other words, how is the transformation law between two frames which are rotating relative to another.
Lets say some particle is moving with a velocity v in an inertial frame S. If we go from this inertial frame to one rotating with an angular frequency ω around the origin, the velocity v in the non rotating system is related to the velocity ##\vec v^{'}## in the rotating frame by ##S^{'}## by $$\vec v = \vec v^{'}+\vec ω \times \vec r^{'} \qquad (1)$$ Now, we move to another frame ##S^{''}## which is rotating relative to ##S^{'}## around the same origin with an angular velocity Ω. My question is now: How does the expression for v above look in this frame. I know that for the velocities one can derive the expression (1) by writing the position vector in each of the bases and then compare the total time derivatives. Consequently, the velocities should be related by the same equation as above, like $$\vec v^{'} = \vec v^{''}+\vec Ω \times \vec r^{''}$$ But I am not sure though. Is it right to just express the crossproduct in (1) in the new frame like $$ D \vec ω \times \vec r^{'}= \vec ω^{''} \times \vec r^{''} $$ with D being the rotation matrix between ##S^{'}## and ##S^{''}##? One would then arrive at $$\vec v = \vec v^{''}+\vec Ω_{tot} \times \vec r^{''} $$ with ##\vec Ω_{tot}=\vec Ω+\vec ω^{''}##
Further, I'd like to ask about the relative velocity of the particle to the rotating frame ##S^{'}##. Is this something like $$\vec v_{S,S^{'}} = \vec v-\vec ω \times \vec r^{'} \qquad (2)$$ And if we transform this quantity into the rotating frame ##S^{''}##, does it stay invariant? Like the analogue case of linear relative velocities that stay invariant under linear velocity transformations. How would the crossproduct term transform here? Thanks in advance for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
May I imagine that teacup rides belongs to your successive rotations with sharing direction of omegas ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
224