Verify Solution to Homework Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around verifying a solution to a physics homework problem involving projectile motion. The user initially calculated the launch angle (α) as 4.915 degrees and the vertical offset (Yoffset) as 13.444 cm. After feedback, the user revised the angle to 1.92 degrees and the Yoffset to 13.38 cm using trigonometric methods. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations, particularly using a precise value for gravitational acceleration, suggesting 9.807 m/s² for improved accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion equations in physics
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and identities
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics, particularly constant velocity equations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving angles and distances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of projectile motion equations
  • Learn about the significance of using accurate constants in physics calculations
  • Explore advanced trigonometric identities and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching projectile motion concepts, and anyone involved in solving kinematics problems requiring precise calculations.

Help1212
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a homwork question that I've been having some trouble with but have come up with a solution.. can someone please verify that I'm on the right path?

The homwork problem is here http://i51.tinypic.com/bbeaf.jpg

Homework Equations

vx= vocos(theta) vy=vosin(theta)

constant vel equations for physics 1

The Attempt at a Solution



Spliting the motion into x-y axis
Horizontal: u= vocosα= 15cosα, a=0, d= 2.5 m
Vertical= u= u= vosinα= 15sinα, a= -9.8, d= 0.05 m
Horizontal: no acceleration so constant velocity time taken to reach to the center
t= 2.5/15cosα = 1/6cosα
Vertical:
-s = +(15sinα)t + 0.5*(-9.8)*t^2
-0.05 = +(15sinα) (1/6cosα) - 0.5*9.8*(1/6cosα)^2
-0.05 = +(2.5tanα) - 4.9/(36sec^2α)
-0.05 = +(2.5tanα) - 4.9(cos^2α) /36
Because angle is very small, cos^2 α ~ 1 .
-0.05= +(2.5tanα) - 4.9/36
α = tan^-1 (0.086)
α = 4.915 degree

now Yoffset
in vertical motion,
Vertical: v=0 ; u= vosinα= 15sinα, a= -9.8, d= ?
02 = (15sin4.92)2 +2*-9.8d
D=8.444 cm (converted from 0.084m to cm)
Yoffset= 13.444 cm
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to follow your math when the divisions have been "lost". It took me a while to figure out that your "16cosα" is really (1/6)*cos(a).

The trig identity is: cos(2θ) = 2cos(θ)2 - 1

So 2cos(θ)2 = cos(2θ) + 1

If 2θ is small, then cos(2θ) ≈ 1, and you find 2cos(θ)2 ≈ 2.

As a result, the angle that I calculate for α is less than half what you found.
 
Sorry for the confusion I fixed some errors in my solution now. I think I have the right answer but am not so sure about the y offset especially..
 
You might want to check your math in these lines:

-0.05= +(2.5tanα) - 4.9/36
α = tan^-1 (0.086)
α = 4.915 degree

Calculating the offset should be a simple matter of trigonometry. If you extend the line through the initial velocity vector to the dart board, and you draw the horizontal line from the launch point to the dart board (note: 5cm above center line), then you have a right angle triangle. You know the horizontal distance, and you've calculated the launch angle in the previous stage, so you can determine the height of the offset above the launch point. Don't forget the 5cm vertical offset of the launch point.
 
First of all thanks for the help!

Okay so for the angle.. i redid my math and have come up with 1.92 degress after I divided by 2.5 and took the tangent inverse in -0.05= +(2.5tanα) - 4.9/36

As for the Y-offset I took the trig approach to the question and came up with 13.38 cm after I solved for the missing side by multiplying tan of 1.92 by 250cm & adding 5cm. Which is close to the value I received for using the constant vel equation initially.

Okay so I think I'm right this time.. did I miss something?

Thanks again!
 
Looks good. The only thing that I might consider is using a more accurate figure for the acceleration due to gravity in the determination of the angle. The question indicated that three figures of accuracy be used, so I'd probably use more for the intermediate calculation values and round the final result.

An acceptable value for g might be 9.807 m/s2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
883
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K