Vertical Motion with Quadratic Air Resistance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for a baseball thrown vertically upward, subject to quadratic air resistance. The equation is established as v(dot) = -g[1+(v/vter)²], where vter represents the terminal velocity defined as vter = sqrt(mg/c). The user seeks assistance in integrating the equation after separating variables, specifically transitioning from vdv/(1 + (v/vter)²) = -gdy to expressing the maximum height ymax in terms of initial velocity vo, mass m, and drag coefficient c. The maximum height is ultimately expressed as ymax = [(vter)²/2g] * ln[(vter)² + (vo)²] / (vter)².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of quadratic drag forces in physics
  • Concept of terminal velocity and its calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion under non-constant forces
  • Learn about the application of the vdv/dx rule in physics
  • Explore integration techniques for separable differential equations
  • Research the effects of air resistance on projectile motion in detail
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators seeking to explain the effects of air resistance on projectile motion.

Rumble
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Before I write anything, I want to apologize because I have no idea how to write equations on this website. This is my first post >.< Also, thank you for helping in advance!

Homework Statement


A baseball is thrown vertically up with speed vo and is subject to a quadratic drag with magnitude f(v) = cv2. Write down the equation of motion for the upward journey (measuring y vertically UP) and show that it can be rewritten as v(dot) = -g[1+(v/vter)2]. Use the "vdv/dx rule" to write v(dot) as vdv/dy and then solve the equation of motion by separating variables (put all terms involving v on one side and all terms involving y on the other). integrate both sides to give y in terms of v, and hence v as a function of y. Show that the baseball's maximum height is

ymax = [(vter)2/2g]*ln[ [ (vter)2 + (vo)2 ] / [(vter)2] ]

whew. If vo = 20m/s and the baseball has the parameters: mass m=.15kg and diameter D = 7cm, what is ymax? Compare with the value in a vacuum.


Homework Equations


Ok... Well first, in case you didn't get it, the vdv/dx rule is just that:

v(dot) = vdv/dx = (1/2)d(v2)/dx.

(only in this problem we just use y instead of x.)

Another formula that's important is the terminal velocity, which is
vter = sqrt(mg/c)


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the first thing it asks is to write down the equation of motion. I'm a little unsure, but I think that it is :

m*v(dot) = -mg - cv2

which can be rearranged:
v(dot) = -g - cv2/m

and substituting c/m = g/(vter)2 in...
v(dot) = -g (1 + (v/vter)2)

so then we use the vdv/dx rule...
vdv = -g*dy*(1 + (v/vter)2)

and separating variables like it said,
vdv/(1 + (v/vter)2) = -gdy

But now I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do. When it said to separate variables, it said that I should put the terms with a y on one side and the terms with a v on the other, but... are there any terms with a y? Other than the dy? I also have no idea how to integrate this equation... Can anybody help me figure out the next few steps? Thank you again.

PS: is there a way to actually have it write v(dot) normally - as in, with a dot above the v?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok so I went ahead and tried to integrate vdv/(1 + (v/vter)2) = -gdy

On the left, I went from vo to v and on the right i went from 0 to y. This gave me (and watch out i switch the left and right sides here):

-gy = sqrt[ (1/vter2)*v2 + 1 ] / (1/vter2) from vo to v.

Now, vo = 0 at ymax, so you can plug those in, and you get

-gymax = (vter)2*sqrt[ (1/vter2)*v2 + 1 ] from vo to 0

which simplifies to

-gymax = vter2 * (1 - sqrt[ (vo/vter)2 +1 ]

and I have no idea how to make that into the given equation (with ln and stuff) that is shown in my first post.
 
Rumble said:
vdv/(1 + (v/vter)2) = -gdy
-gy = sqrt[ (1/vter2)*v2 + 1 ] / (1/vter2)
No, that integration step with v is wrong. Please write it out in more detail.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K