Equation of motion of a mass on a 2d curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation of motion for a mass sliding on a two-dimensional curve under the influence of gravity. Participants explore the implications of energy conservation in this context, specifically focusing on the kinetic and potential energy terms involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the derivation of the equation of motion using energy conservation principles and discuss the implications of small angle approximations. Questions arise regarding the validity of certain expressions and the assumptions made about derivatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the equations presented. Some participants express uncertainty about simplifying the general equation under specific conditions, while others point out potential errors in the formulation of kinetic and potential energy terms.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the small angle approximation, with participants questioning the assumptions regarding the derivatives involved. The problem statement specifies neglecting other forces, which may influence the discussion on the energy terms.

Jenny Physics
Messages
111
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A mass ##m## slides on a curve described by the equation ##y=f(x)## under the action of gravity (neglect any other forces). Write the equation of motion in the general case and in the case of small angle between the tangent to the curve and the horizontal (i.e. when ##dy/dx## is small).
Relevant Equations
One way is to use conservation of energy ##T=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2}),U=-mgy## so ##T+U=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})-mgy=constant##.
So ##T+U=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})-mgy=constant##. If I derive this with respect to ##t##

$$\dot{x}\ddot{x}+\dot{y}\ddot{y}-g\dot{y}=0$$

Then I use ##\dot{y}=\dot{x}\frac{dy}{dx},\ddot{y}=\ddot{x}\frac{dy}{dx}+\dot{x}^{2}\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}##
to get

$$\ddot{x}+\frac{dy}{dx}\left[\ddot{x}\frac{dy}{dx}+\dot{x}^{2}\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}\right]-g\frac{dy}{dx}=0$$

This is the general equation. From here not sure how to simplify in the small limit without making several assumptions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When dy/dx is very small compared to 1 then its square will be negligible in that equation.
While not directly given by the small dy/dx the problem statement might also assume that d2y/dx2 is small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics
What is wrong with $$\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2\left[1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2\right]-gy(x)=C$$ or $$\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{\frac{C+gy}{\left[1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2\right]}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics
Jenny Physics said:
Problem Statement: A mass ##m## slides on a curve described by the equation ##y=f(x)## under the action of gravity (neglect any other forces). Write the equation of motion in the general case and in the case of small angle between the tangent to the curve and the horizontal (i.e. when ##dy/dx## is small).
Relevant Equations: One way is to use conservation of energy ##T=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2}),U=-mgy## so ##T+U=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})-mgy=constant##.

You have a sign error: if y increases then the potential energy should also increase.

So ##T+U=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^{2}+\dot{y}^{2})-mgy=constant##. If I derive this with respect to ##t##

$$\dot{x}\ddot{x}+\dot{y}\ddot{y}-g\dot{y}=0$$

Easier to use \dot y = f'(x) \dot x before differentiating with respect to t. Then \ddot y doesn't appear.

Then I use ##\dot{y}=\dot{x}\frac{dy}{dx},\ddot{y}=\ddot{x}\frac{dy}{dx}+\dot{x}^{2}\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}##
to get

$$\ddot{x}+\frac{dy}{dx}\left[\ddot{x}\frac{dy}{dx}+\dot{x}^{2}\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}}\right]-g\frac{dy}{dx}=0$$

This is the general equation. From here not sure how to simplify in the small limit without making several assumptions.

Chestermiller said:
What is wrong with $$\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2\left[1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2\right]-gy(x)=C$$ or $$\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{\frac{C+gy}{\left[1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2\right]}}$$

I think you are missing a factor of 1/2 from the KE, and again the PE term has the wrong sign. But this does show most clearly what happens when |f'(x)| \ll 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics
pasmith said:
I think you are missing a factor of 1/2 from the KE, and again the PE term has the wrong sign. But this does show most clearly what happens when |f'(x)| \ll 1.
Yes, you're right. I left out a factor of 2. It should read: $$\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{\frac{C+2gy}{\left[1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2\right]}}$$The sign of the PE term is correct if y is measured downwards. And, of course, it is trivial to get the equation when f' is negligible; I didn't feel I needed to add that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jenny Physics

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K