Vertical Rod with two masses attached falling over table.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a vertical rod of length L with two masses, m1 and m2, attached at each end, positioned at point P on a frictionless table. The rod is initially in unstable equilibrium and falls under the influence of gravity. Participants emphasize the importance of analyzing the center of mass rather than relying solely on conservation of linear momentum, as the system's rotation and gravitational forces complicate the momentum conservation approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and equilibrium
  • Knowledge of center of mass calculations
  • Familiarity with gravitational forces and their effects on motion
  • Basic principles of momentum conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of center of mass in multi-body systems
  • Learn about rotational motion and angular momentum
  • Explore the effects of gravity on unstable equilibrium systems
  • Review examples of similar physics problems involving falling objects
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, educators looking for problem-solving strategies, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of systems in unstable equilibrium.

DeLaHostia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This problem is very easy, but there is some conceptual point of view I am missing.
There is a vertical rod of length L without mass on its own that has two masses, m1 and m2, attached at each end standing on point P at a table. The rod is at unstable equilibrium at first. The only force is gravity and there is no friction between the m2 and the table. The systems is moved from it equilibrium, and the rod falls down.

Known data:
m1
m2
Lenght of rod: L
Rod has no mass
No friction with the table
P the point where the rod stands vertically.

Homework Equations


At what distance of P will each mass fall?


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to work this out with conservation of linear momentum but I could not succeed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having a bit of trouble seeing what the problem is asking. Do you mean at what distance from P will each mass fall?

Conserving momentum will be difficult to use here, since gravity will add momentum to the system, and the movement is going to involve rotation. Instead, try thinking about center of mass, or at least the components of it. Where will the center of mass of the rod be before and after it falls?
 
jackarms said:
Having a bit of trouble seeing what the problem is asking. Do you mean at what distance from P will each mass fall?

Conserving momentum will be difficult to use here, since gravity will add momentum to the system, and the movement is going to involve rotation. Instead, try thinking about center of mass, or at least the components of it. Where will the center of mass of the rod be before and after it falls?
That can be thought of as using conservation of linear momentum (horizontal component), but not merely from initial state to final state. Rather, one needs to consider how the horizontal velocity of the centre of mass might change at any point in the process.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K