Vertical Rod with two masses attached falling over table.

In summary, the problem involves a vertical rod with two masses attached to each end standing on point P at a table. The rod is at unstable equilibrium and is initially only affected by gravity with no friction between the m2 mass and the table. The question asks at what distance from P will each mass fall. Using conservation of linear momentum may be difficult, so considering the center of mass and its horizontal velocity at different points may be a better approach.
  • #1
DeLaHostia
1
0

Homework Statement


This problem is very easy, but there is some conceptual point of view I am missing.
There is a vertical rod of length L without mass on its own that has two masses, m1 and m2, attached at each end standing on point P at a table. The rod is at unstable equilibrium at first. The only force is gravity and there is no friction between the m2 and the table. The systems is moved from it equilibrium, and the rod falls down.

Known data:
m1
m2
Lenght of rod: L
Rod has no mass
No friction with the table
P the point where the rod stands vertically.

Homework Equations


At what distance of P will each mass fall?


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to work this out with conservation of linear momentum but I could not succeed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Having a bit of trouble seeing what the problem is asking. Do you mean at what distance from P will each mass fall?

Conserving momentum will be difficult to use here, since gravity will add momentum to the system, and the movement is going to involve rotation. Instead, try thinking about center of mass, or at least the components of it. Where will the center of mass of the rod be before and after it falls?
 
  • #3
jackarms said:
Having a bit of trouble seeing what the problem is asking. Do you mean at what distance from P will each mass fall?

Conserving momentum will be difficult to use here, since gravity will add momentum to the system, and the movement is going to involve rotation. Instead, try thinking about center of mass, or at least the components of it. Where will the center of mass of the rod be before and after it falls?
That can be thought of as using conservation of linear momentum (horizontal component), but not merely from initial state to final state. Rather, one needs to consider how the horizontal velocity of the centre of mass might change at any point in the process.
 

1. How does the height of the table affect the time it takes for the vertical rod to fall over?

The height of the table does not significantly affect the time it takes for the vertical rod to fall over. This is because the acceleration due to gravity is constant and does not change with the height of the table.

2. Will the masses attached to the vertical rod affect its rate of fall?

Yes, the masses attached to the vertical rod will affect its rate of fall. The greater the mass of the attached masses, the slower the vertical rod will fall due to increased inertia.

3. How does the position of the masses on the vertical rod affect its stability?

The position of the masses on the vertical rod can affect its stability. If the masses are evenly distributed on either side of the rod, it will have greater stability and be less likely to fall over. However, if the masses are unevenly distributed, it may cause the rod to become unbalanced and topple over.

4. What is the relationship between the length of the vertical rod and the time it takes to fall over?

The length of the vertical rod does not have a direct relationship with the time it takes to fall over. However, a longer rod may have a higher center of mass, making it more susceptible to falling over.

5. How can air resistance affect the vertical rod's rate of fall?

Air resistance can slow down the rate of fall for the vertical rod. This is because as the rod falls, it will encounter air resistance, which will exert a force in the opposite direction, causing it to fall at a slower rate. However, the effect of air resistance on the vertical rod will be minimal due to its small surface area compared to its mass.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
882
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
827
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top