Vertical vs Horizontal takeoff (VTO vs HTO)

  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Supposedly taking off horizontally costs less and is more energy efficient than vertical takeoff.

Aside from the issues of staging, and rocket vs. propeller, does anyone know why HTO is better than VTO?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Danger
Gold Member
9,608
244
Welcome to PF, David.
In a vertical take-off, the engine has to supply all of the effort to fight gravity. When rolling, the wings provide the lift and the engine just has to provide lateral motion.
 
  • #3
minger
Science Advisor
1,495
1
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...
 
  • #4
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...
per engine!
 
  • #5
minger
Science Advisor
1,495
1
and unless that thing has a dozen engines mounted god knows where, it's not going to VTO.
 

Related Threads for: Vertical vs Horizontal takeoff (VTO vs HTO)

  • Last Post
2
Replies
47
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Top