Vertical vs Horizontal takeoff (VTO vs HTO)

  • #1
DavidRatcliff
1
0
Supposedly taking off horizontally costs less and is more energy efficient than vertical takeoff.

Aside from the issues of staging, and rocket vs. propeller, does anyone know why HTO is better than VTO?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF, David.
In a vertical take-off, the engine has to supply all of the effort to fight gravity. When rolling, the wings provide the lift and the engine just has to provide lateral motion.
 
  • #3
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...
 
  • #4
minger said:
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...

per engine!
 
  • #5
and unless that thing has a dozen engines mounted god knows where, it's not going to VTO.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
719
Replies
120
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
930
Back
Top