Vertical vs Horizontal takeoff (VTO vs HTO)

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidRatcliff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horizontal Vertical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
DavidRatcliff
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Supposedly taking off horizontally costs less and is more energy efficient than vertical takeoff.

Aside from the issues of staging, and rocket vs. propeller, does anyone know why HTO is better than VTO?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, David.
In a vertical take-off, the engine has to supply all of the effort to fight gravity. When rolling, the wings provide the lift and the engine just has to provide lateral motion.
 
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...
 
minger said:
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...

per engine!