Vertically oriented spring and energy transfers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainZappo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Spring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy transfers involved when a mass is placed on a vertically oriented spring that is initially compressed. Participants explore the kinetic energy of the mass as it passes the equilibrium position of the spring, considering the roles of spring potential energy and gravitational potential energy. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding energy conservation in this system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Zachary Lindsey questions whether the kinetic energy of the mass at the equilibrium position is equal to (1/2)kx^2 or (1/2)kx^2 - mgx, arguing that gravitational potential energy must be considered.
  • Some participants agree with Zachary's reasoning, stating that gravitational potential energy cannot be ignored when calculating the kinetic energy of the mass.
  • Parlyne introduces a distinction based on the reference point for measuring x, suggesting that if x is measured from the uncompressed position of the spring, then the kinetic energy calculation would not account for gravitational potential energy, while measuring from the equilibrium position of the mass-spring system would include both forms of potential energy.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of clarifying the TA's statement and the definitions of equilibrium and compression in the context of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct interpretation of the energy transfers involved, particularly regarding the reference point for measuring compression and the definitions of equilibrium. There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating the kinetic energy of the mass.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on definitions of equilibrium and compression, as well as the assumptions made about the system's initial conditions. The mathematical steps and reasoning presented are not universally accepted, leading to various interpretations of the energy dynamics involved.

CaptainZappo
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I am posing this question due to a statement made by my TA:

Suppose there is a spring pointed vertically upwards. Further, suppose that the spring is compressed a distance x so that it stores some potential energy. A mass is then placed on top of the spring. Assume all energy is conserved.

Here's the question: upon releasing the spring, what is the kinetic energy of the ball as it passes the equilibrium position of the spring? Is it equal in magnitude to (1/2)kx^2 where x is the amount the spring is compressed, or is it (1/2)kx^2 - mgx?

My TA said the former is correct, while I cannot figure out why it is not the latter. My reasoning: as the ball is rising from its initial height (the point at which the spring is fully compressed) some of that energy is being converted to gravitational potential energy. The rest goes to kinetic energy.

Any insight will be greatly appreciated,
-Zachary Lindsey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning is correct; you cannot ignore gravitational PE in calculating the KE of the mass.
 
Thank you.
 
CaptainZappo said:
I am posing this question due to a statement made by my TA:

Suppose there is a spring pointed vertically upwards. Further, suppose that the spring is compressed a distance x so that it stores some potential energy. A mass is then placed on top of the spring. Assume all energy is conserved.

Here's the question: upon releasing the spring, what is the kinetic energy of the ball as it passes the equilibrium position of the spring? Is it equal in magnitude to (1/2)kx^2 where x is the amount the spring is compressed, or is it (1/2)kx^2 - mgx?

My TA said the former is correct, while I cannot figure out why it is not the latter. My reasoning: as the ball is rising from its initial height (the point at which the spring is fully compressed) some of that energy is being converted to gravitational potential energy. The rest goes to kinetic energy.

Any insight will be greatly appreciated,
-Zachary Lindsey

Who is correct depends on whether x is the amount the spring is compressed from its free equilibrium length or that from its equilibrium length with the mass sitting on it. If it is the former, you are correct. If it's the later, your TA is correct.

To see this, let's let y be the distance the mass is sitting above the spring's free equilibrium position. Then, the potential energy is:

[tex]V(y) = \frac{1}{2} k y^2 + mgy[/tex]

We can rearrange this:

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> V(y) &= \frac{1}{2} k \left (y^2 + 2\frac{mg}{k} y\right ) \\<br /> &= \frac{1}{2} k \left (y^2 + 2\frac{mg}{k} y + \frac{m^2g^2}{k^2} \right ) - \frac{m^2g^2}{2k} \\<br /> &= \frac{1}{2} k \left (y + \frac{mg}{k} \right )^2 - \frac{m^2g^2}{2k}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

From this, we can see that the mass' height above the compressed equilibrium length is [tex]x = y + \frac{mg}{k}[/tex].

So, [tex]V(x) = \frac{1}{2} k x^2 - \frac{m^2g^2}{2k}[/tex].

The difference between the potential energy when the spring is compressed by a distance x from the compressed equilibrium position ([tex]y = \frac{-mg}{k}[/tex]) and at the compressed equilibrium is:

[tex]\begin{align*} \Delta V &= V(x) - V(0) \\<br /> &= \frac{1}{2} k x^2 - \frac{m^2g^2}{2k} - \left (\frac{-m^2g^2}{2k} \right ) \\<br /> &= \frac{1}{2} k x^2<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
 
Parlyne is certainly correct. From the way the conditions were specified in the OP:
CaptainZappo said:
Suppose there is a spring pointed vertically upwards. Further, suppose that the spring is compressed a distance x so that it stores some potential energy.
I presumed that x measures the compression from the uncompressed position of the spring. Only later is a mass involved:
A mass is then placed on top of the spring.

Here's the question: upon releasing the spring, what is the kinetic energy of the ball as it passes the equilibrium position of the spring?
The answer to that question depends on the meaning of "equilibrium postion" and where x is measured from. If, as I assumed from your description, x is measured from the uncompressed position of the spring (and equilibrium means x = 0), then 1/2kx^2 represents spring PE only and does not include gravitational PE.

But, as Parlyne explained, if x is measured from the equilibrium position of the mass-spring system (which is not the uncompressed position of the spring), then 1/2kx^2 represents changes in both spring PE and gravitational PE together.

CaptainZappo: Better tell us exactly what the TA stated, not your interpretation of it (if you can recall).

Regardless of what the TA says, learn what Parlyne explained and you'll be ahead of the game. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K