(Very Basic) Movement of Charged Particles Through Parallel Plate Apparatus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential in a parallel-plate apparatus with a total separation of 5 cm and an electric field strength of 5000 N/C. The correct electric potential two-fifths of the way through the apparatus is determined to be 250 V, not 150 V as initially calculated. The confusion arose from the misunderstanding that electric potential decreases as the current flows, which is not applicable in this context. The potential difference across the entire distance is 250 V, confirming that the potential at any point must be less than this total value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the formula V = ed for calculating electric potential
  • Knowledge of parallel-plate capacitor configurations
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric field strength and potential difference in parallel-plate capacitors
  • Learn about the concept of equipotential surfaces in electrostatics
  • Explore the effects of varying plate separation on electric potential
  • Investigate the implications of electric potential in circuit design and analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, electrical engineering majors, and anyone studying electrostatics or parallel-plate capacitor systems will benefit from this discussion.

012anonymousx
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the electric potential two-fifths of the way through a parallel-plate apparatus (from the positive plate) if the plates have a total separation of 5cm and field strength of 5000N/C.

Homework Equations


Difference Potential Energy = Electric Field Strength x Distance
V = ed

The Attempt at a Solution


= 5000 x (0.05 - ((2/5)(0.05))
= 5000 x (0.05-0.02)
= 5000 x (0.03)
= 150

Real answer is 250, so basically the whole distance of 0.05.
I thought that electric potential decreases as the current flows from positive to negative?
That is why, in my solution, I took the two-fifth of the whole distance away.
Edit: Please let me know if my solution as infact correct :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks fine to me. As you say, the total potential difference is 250V, so a correct answer for the potential partway between the plates can't be 250V also.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K