Very confused: why is the path difference in double slit interference dsinθ?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of path difference in double slit interference, specifically questioning the validity of the formula dsinθ. Participants express confusion regarding the geometric interpretation of this formula and its implications for the behavior of light rays from the slits.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the reasoning behind the path difference formula and its geometric representation, particularly the use of a perpendicular line to determine path difference. They explore whether the formula is a simplification due to the relative distances of the slits and the screen.

Discussion Status

Participants have acknowledged that the dsinθ equation is an approximation valid for small angles, with some noting that the right angle assumption is not rigorously proven. There is a general agreement on the approximation's validity for small angles, but no consensus on the implications of the orange angle in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention that the approximation holds for angles less than about 10 to 20 degrees, indicating a constraint on the applicability of the formula in practical scenarios.

lillybeans
Messages
67
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The more I think about path difference, the more confused I get.

First of all, HOW DO PEOPLE know that the path difference is dsinθ? Why do we draw a line coming from the first ray that is PERPENDICULAR to the second ray when determining path difference?

Please see diagram:
121qtr8.jpg


If the PD is the extra distance that ray B travels, then subtracting the PD would leave AP=OP, so now you have an isosceles triangle, and the two blue angles must equal. Now, if we do "dsinθ" to determine the PD, then that gives us a right triangle. If the orange angle is always 90 degrees, then the blue angles must also be 90 degrees. This doesn't make sense, because this suggests that the two rays are parallel. If they are parallel, they'll never converge to the same point and interfere. So my question is: is this "dsinθ" formula for PD simply a simplified assumption because the slits are so close together and the screen is so far away that the rays can be thought of as "nearly parallel"? But strictly speaking the orange angle is NOT actually 90 degrees in reality?

Please help. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dSin(theta) equation is only true for small angles which means roughly less than 10degrees
 
Emilyjoint said:
The dSin(theta) equation is only true for small angles which means roughly less than 10degrees

so the formula IS an approximation and the right angle is not mathematically-proven using geometry...
 
I think that is more or less correct.
The smaller the angle the more that little triangle looks like a 90degree triangle.
It is an approximation but it is surprising how close Sin(theta), Tan(theta) and theta in radians are for angles less than about 10 or 20degrees
 
Emilyjoint said:
I think that is more or less correct.
The smaller the angle the more that little triangle looks like a 90degree triangle.
It is an approximation but it is surprising how close Sin(theta), Tan(theta) and theta in radians are for angles less than about 10 or 20degrees

Thanks, I was quite confused as to why the orange angle is always 90 degrees, but I think that it makes more sense now that it's just an approximation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
923
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K